netdev - [PATCH net-next 09/11] tls: rx: inline consuming the skb at the end of the loop

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20220408183134.1054551-10-kuba@kernel.org>
Date:   Fri,  8 Apr 2022 11:31:32 -0700
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To:     davem@...emloft.net, pabeni@...hat.com
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, borisp@...dia.com,
        john.fastabend@...il.com, daniel@...earbox.net,
        vfedorenko@...ek.ru, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 09/11] tls: rx: inline consuming the skb at the end of the loop

tls_sw_advance_skb() always consumes the skb at the end of the loop.

To fall here the following must be true:

 !async && !is_peek && !retain_skb
   retain_skb => !zc && rxm->full_len > len
     # but non-full record implies !zc, so above can be simplified as
   retain_skb => rxm->full_len > len

 !async && !is_peek && !(rxm->full_len > len)
 !async && !is_peek && rxm->full_len <= len

tls_sw_advance_skb() returns false if len < rxm->full_len
which can't be true given conditions above.

Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
---
 net/tls/tls_sw.c | 29 +++++------------------------
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/tls/tls_sw.c b/net/tls/tls_sw.c
index 5ad0b2505988..3aa8fe1c6e77 100644
--- a/net/tls/tls_sw.c
+++ b/net/tls/tls_sw.c
@@ -1611,27 +1611,6 @@ int decrypt_skb(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb,
 	return decrypt_internal(sk, skb, NULL, sgout, &darg);
 }
 
-static bool tls_sw_advance_skb(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb,
-			       unsigned int len)
-{
-	struct tls_context *tls_ctx = tls_get_ctx(sk);
-	struct tls_sw_context_rx *ctx = tls_sw_ctx_rx(tls_ctx);
-	struct strp_msg *rxm = strp_msg(skb);
-
-	if (len < rxm->full_len) {
-		rxm->offset += len;
-		rxm->full_len -= len;
-		return false;
-	}
-	consume_skb(skb);
-
-	/* Finished with message */
-	ctx->recv_pkt = NULL;
-	__strp_unpause(&ctx->strp);
-
-	return true;
-}
-
 static int tls_record_content_type(struct msghdr *msg, struct tls_msg *tlm,
 				   u8 *control)
 {
@@ -1894,7 +1873,11 @@ int tls_sw_recvmsg(struct sock *sk,
 			skb_queue_tail(&ctx->rx_list, skb);
 			ctx->recv_pkt = NULL;
 			__strp_unpause(&ctx->strp);
-		} else if (tls_sw_advance_skb(sk, skb, chunk)) {
+		} else {
+			consume_skb(skb);
+			ctx->recv_pkt = NULL;
+			__strp_unpause(&ctx->strp);
+
 			/* Return full control message to
 			 * userspace before trying to parse
 			 * another message type
@@ -1902,8 +1885,6 @@ int tls_sw_recvmsg(struct sock *sk,
 			msg->msg_flags |= MSG_EOR;
 			if (control != TLS_RECORD_TYPE_DATA)
 				goto recv_end;
-		} else {
-			break;
 		}
 	}
 
-- 
2.34.1