netdev - [PATCH net-next 01/10] tls: rx: jump to a more appropriate label

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20220408033823.965896-2-kuba@kernel.org>
Date:   Thu,  7 Apr 2022 20:38:14 -0700
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To:     davem@...emloft.net, pabeni@...hat.com
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, borisp@...dia.com,
        john.fastabend@...il.com, daniel@...earbox.net,
        vfedorenko@...ek.ru, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 01/10] tls: rx: jump to a more appropriate label

'recv_end:' checks num_async and decrypted, and is then followed
by the 'end' label. Since we know that decrypted and num_async
are 0 at the start we can jump to 'end'.

Move the init of decrypted and num_async to let the compiler
catch if I'm wrong.

Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
---
 net/tls/tls_sw.c | 7 ++++---
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/tls/tls_sw.c b/net/tls/tls_sw.c
index 0024a692f0f8..3b3fe455d680 100644
--- a/net/tls/tls_sw.c
+++ b/net/tls/tls_sw.c
@@ -1760,6 +1760,7 @@ int tls_sw_recvmsg(struct sock *sk,
 	struct tls_sw_context_rx *ctx = tls_sw_ctx_rx(tls_ctx);
 	struct tls_prot_info *prot = &tls_ctx->prot_info;
 	struct sk_psock *psock;
+	int num_async, pending;
 	unsigned char control = 0;
 	ssize_t decrypted = 0;
 	struct strp_msg *rxm;
@@ -1772,8 +1773,6 @@ int tls_sw_recvmsg(struct sock *sk,
 	bool is_kvec = iov_iter_is_kvec(&msg->msg_iter);
 	bool is_peek = flags & MSG_PEEK;
 	bool bpf_strp_enabled;
-	int num_async = 0;
-	int pending;
 
 	flags |= nonblock;
 
@@ -1795,12 +1794,14 @@ int tls_sw_recvmsg(struct sock *sk,
 	}
 
 	if (len <= copied)
-		goto recv_end;
+		goto end;
 
 	target = sock_rcvlowat(sk, flags & MSG_WAITALL, len);
 	len = len - copied;
 	timeo = sock_rcvtimeo(sk, flags & MSG_DONTWAIT);
 
+	decrypted = 0;
+	num_async = 0;
 	while (len && (decrypted + copied < target || ctx->recv_pkt)) {
 		bool retain_skb = false;
 		bool zc = false;
-- 
2.34.1