[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3d5c2bfc-cfb1-ea2d-f88c-36e0e4f92293@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2022 21:50:19 -0600
From: David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>
To: menglong8.dong@...il.com, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com
Cc: rostedt@...dmis.org, mingo@...hat.com, xeb@...l.ru,
davem@...emloft.net, yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org,
imagedong@...cent.com, edumazet@...gle.com, kafai@...com,
talalahmad@...gle.com, keescook@...omium.org, alobakin@...me,
flyingpeng@...cent.com, mengensun@...cent.com,
dongli.zhang@...cle.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, benbjiang@...cent.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND net-next v5 2/4] net: skb: rename
SKB_DROP_REASON_PTYPE_ABSENT
On 4/7/22 12:20 AM, menglong8.dong@...il.com wrote:
> From: Menglong Dong <imagedong@...cent.com>
>
> As David Ahern suggested, the reasons for skb drops should be more
> general and not be code based.
>
> Therefore, rename SKB_DROP_REASON_PTYPE_ABSENT to
> SKB_DROP_REASON_UNHANDLED_PROTO, which is used for the cases of no
> L3 protocol handler, no L4 protocol handler, version extensions, etc.
>
> From previous discussion, now we have the aim to make these reasons
> more abstract and users based, avoiding code based.
>
> Signed-off-by: Menglong Dong <imagedong@...cent.com>
> ---
> include/linux/skbuff.h | 8 +++-----
> include/trace/events/skb.h | 2 +-
> net/core/dev.c | 8 +++-----
> 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
Reviewed-by: David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists