[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220409125958.92629-5-laoar.shao@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 9 Apr 2022 12:59:58 +0000
From: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@...il.com>
To: andrii@...nel.org, ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net,
kafai@...com, songliubraving@...com, yhs@...com,
john.fastabend@...il.com, kpsingh@...nel.org, shuah@...nel.org
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v4 4/4] tools/runqslower: Use libbpf 1.0 API mode instead of RLIMIT_MEMLOCK
Explicitly set libbpf 1.0 API mode, then we can avoid using the deprecated
RLIMIT_MEMLOCK.
Signed-off-by: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@...il.com>
---
tools/bpf/runqslower/runqslower.c | 18 ++----------------
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/bpf/runqslower/runqslower.c b/tools/bpf/runqslower/runqslower.c
index d78f4148597f..83c5993a139a 100644
--- a/tools/bpf/runqslower/runqslower.c
+++ b/tools/bpf/runqslower/runqslower.c
@@ -4,7 +4,6 @@
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <string.h>
-#include <sys/resource.h>
#include <time.h>
#include <bpf/libbpf.h>
#include <bpf/bpf.h>
@@ -88,16 +87,6 @@ int libbpf_print_fn(enum libbpf_print_level level,
return vfprintf(stderr, format, args);
}
-static int bump_memlock_rlimit(void)
-{
- struct rlimit rlim_new = {
- .rlim_cur = RLIM_INFINITY,
- .rlim_max = RLIM_INFINITY,
- };
-
- return setrlimit(RLIMIT_MEMLOCK, &rlim_new);
-}
-
void handle_event(void *ctx, int cpu, void *data, __u32 data_sz)
{
const struct runq_event *e = data;
@@ -133,11 +122,8 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
libbpf_set_print(libbpf_print_fn);
- err = bump_memlock_rlimit();
- if (err) {
- fprintf(stderr, "failed to increase rlimit: %d", err);
- return 1;
- }
+ /* Use libbpf 1.0 API mode */
+ libbpf_set_strict_mode(LIBBPF_STRICT_ALL);
obj = runqslower_bpf__open();
if (!obj) {
--
2.17.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists