[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220410215813.sxqmvmm5wkeguj6y@sx1>
Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2022 14:58:13 -0700
From: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>
To: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
Cc: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>,
linux-netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
RDMA mailing list <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
Raed Salem <raeds@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH mlx5-next 01/17] net/mlx5: Simplify IPsec flow steering
init/cleanup functions
On 10 Apr 20:21, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
>On Sun, Apr 10, 2022 at 09:46:20AM -0700, Saeed Mahameed wrote:
>> On 10 Apr 11:28, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
>> > From: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...dia.com>
>> >
>> > Cleanup IPsec FS initialization and cleanup functions.
>>
>> Can you be more clear about what are you cleaning up ?
>>
>> unfolding/joining static functions shouldn't be considered as cleanup.
>
>And how would you describe extensive usage of one time called functions
>that have no use as standalone ones?
>
Functional programming.
>This patch makes sure that all flow steering initialized and cleaned at
>one place and allows me to present coherent picture of what is needed
>for IPsec FS.
>
This is already the case before this patch.
>You should focus on the end result of this series rather on single patch.
> 15 files changed, 320 insertions(+), 839 deletions(-)
Overall the series is fine, this patch in particular is unnecessary cancelation of
others previous decisions, which i personally like and might as well have
suggested myself, so let's avoid such clutter.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists