netdev - Re: [PATCH] drivers: nfc: nfcmrvl: fix double free bug in nfcmrvl_nci_unregister

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <6781b193-cd3b-e5ab-ce99-263edd4146bb@linaro.org>
Date:   Sun, 10 Apr 2022 11:27:09 +0200
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     Duoming Zhou <duoming@....edu.cn>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        davem@...emloft.net, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
        alexander.deucher@....com, broonie@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers: nfc: nfcmrvl: fix double free bug in
 nfcmrvl_nci_unregister_dev()

On 10/04/2022 10:31, Duoming Zhou wrote:
> There is a potential double bug in nfcmrvl usb driver between
> unregister and resume operation.
> 

Thank you for your patch. There is something to discuss/improve.

> The race that cause that double free bug can be shown as below:

Your patch solves the most visible race, but because of lack of locking,
I believe race still might exist:

   (FREE)                   |      (USE)
                            | nfcmrvl_resume
                            |  nfcmrvl_submit_bulk_urb
                            |   nfcmrvl_bulk_complete
                            |    nfcmrvl_nci_recv_frame
                            |     nfcmrvl_fw_dnld_recv_frame
                            |      queue_work
                            |       fw_dnld_rx_work
nfcmrvl_disconnect          |
 nfcmrvl_nci_unregister_dev |
  nfcmrvl_fw_dnld_deinit    |
   wait for the workqueue to finish |
                            |        fw_dnld_over
                            |         release_firmware
                            |          kfree(fw);
                            |          no synchronization //(1)
  if (fw_download_in_progress)
    - no synchronization, so CPU sees old value
  nfcmrvl_fw_dnld_abort     |
   fw_dnld_over             |         ...
    if (priv->fw_dnld.fw)   |
    release_firmware        |
     kfree(fw); //(2)       |
     ...                    |         fw = NULL;

The kfree() from (2) would still free old value. Even if fw=NULL happens
earlier, it is not propagated back to the other CPU, unless there are
some implicit barriers due to workqueue?

Is it safe then to rely on such implicit barriers from workqueue?

> 
>    (FREE)                   |      (USE)
>                             | nfcmrvl_resume
>                             |  nfcmrvl_submit_bulk_urb
>                             |   nfcmrvl_bulk_complete
>                             |    nfcmrvl_nci_recv_frame
>                             |     nfcmrvl_fw_dnld_recv_frame
>                             |      queue_work
>                             |       fw_dnld_rx_work
>                             |        fw_dnld_over
>                             |         release_firmware
>                             |          kfree(fw); //(1)
> nfcmrvl_disconnect          |
>  nfcmrvl_nci_unregister_dev |
>   nfcmrvl_fw_dnld_abort     |
>    fw_dnld_over             |         ...
>     if (priv->fw_dnld.fw)   |
>     release_firmware        |
>      kfree(fw); //(2)       |
>      ...                    |         fw = NULL;
> 

Best regards,
Krzysztof