[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220411130255.385520-1-liujian56@huawei.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2022 21:02:53 +0800
From: Liu Jian <liujian56@...wei.com>
To: <ast@...nel.org>, <daniel@...earbox.net>, <andrii@...nel.org>,
<kafai@...com>, <songliubraving@...com>, <yhs@...com>,
<john.fastabend@...il.com>, <kpsingh@...nel.org>,
<davem@...emloft.net>, <kuba@...nel.org>, <sdf@...gle.com>,
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <bpf@...r.kernel.org>
CC: <liujian56@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf 0/2] Enlarge offset check value in bpf_skb_load_bytes
The data length of skb frags + frag_list may be greater than 0xffff,
and skb_header_pointer can not handle negative offset and negative len.
So here INT_MAX is used to check the validity of offset and len.
And add the test case for the change.
Liu Jian (2):
net: Enlarge offset check value from 0xffff to INT_MAX in
bpf_skb_load_bytes
selftests: bpf: add test for skb_load_bytes
net/core/filter.c | 4 +-
.../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/skb_load_bytes.c | 65 +++++++++++++++++++
.../selftests/bpf/progs/skb_load_bytes.c | 37 +++++++++++
3 files changed, 104 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/skb_load_bytes.c
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/skb_load_bytes.c
--
2.17.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists