[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220411130715.516fc5cc@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2022 13:07:15 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Josua Mayer <josua@...id-run.com>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, alvaro.karsz@...id-run.com,
Michael Hennerich <michael.hennerich@...log.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Alexandru Ardelean <alexandru.ardelean@...log.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] dt: adin: document clk-out property
On Mon, 11 Apr 2022 10:42:18 +0300 Josua Mayer wrote:
> > The binding should describe the hardware, not implementation in Linux,
> > therefore you should actually list all possible choices. The driver then
> > can just return EINVAL on unsupported choices (or map them back to only
> > one supported).
>
> I have prepared a draft for the entries that should exist, it covers
> five of the 6 available bits. Maybe you can comment if this is
> understandable?
>
> adi,phy-output-clock:
> description: Select clock output on GP_CLK pin. Three clocks are
> available:
> A 25MHz reference, a free-running 125MHz and a recovered 125MHz.
> The phy can also automatically switch between the reference and the
> respective 125MHz clocks based on its internal state.
> $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/string
> enum:
> - 25mhz-reference
> - 125mhz-free-running
> - 125mhz-recovered
> - adaptive-free-running
> - adaptive-recovered
>
> Bit no. 3 (GE_REF_CLK_EN) is special in that it can be enabled
> independently from the 5 choices above,
> and it controls a different pin. Therefore it deserves its own property,
> perhaps a flag or boolean adi,phy-output-ref-clock.
> Any opinion if this should be added, or we can omit it completely?
Noob question - can you explain how this property describes HW?
I thought we had a framework for clock config, and did not require
vendor specific properties of this sort.
The recovered vs free running makes the entire thing sound like
a SyncE related knob, irrelevant to normal HW operation.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists