[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220411225743.GA8838@u2004-local>
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2022 16:57:43 -0600
From: David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>
To: Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@...ckwall.org>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, roopa@...dia.com, idosch@...sch.org,
kuba@...nel.org, davem@...emloft.net,
bridge@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 1/8] net: rtnetlink: add RTM_FLUSHNEIGH
On Mon, Apr 11, 2022 at 08:29:27PM +0300, Nikolay Aleksandrov wrote:
> Add a new rtnetlink type used to flush neigh objects. It will be
> initially used to add flush with filtering support for bridge fdbs, but
> it also opens the door to add similar support to others (e.g. vxlan).
>
> Signed-off-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@...ckwall.org>
> ---
> include/uapi/linux/rtnetlink.h | 3 +++
> security/selinux/nlmsgtab.c | 3 ++-
> 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/rtnetlink.h b/include/uapi/linux/rtnetlink.h
> index 83849a37db5b..06001cfd404b 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/rtnetlink.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/rtnetlink.h
> @@ -194,6 +194,9 @@ enum {
> RTM_GETTUNNEL,
> #define RTM_GETTUNNEL RTM_GETTUNNEL
>
> + RTM_FLUSHNEIGH = 124,
> +#define RTM_FLUSHNEIGH RTM_FLUSHNEIGH
> +
rtm message types are "new, del, get, set" quadruplets; making this a
flush breaks the current consistent style. Can this be done by adding
a FLUSH flag to the RTM_DELNEIGH message?
> __RTM_MAX,
> #define RTM_MAX (((__RTM_MAX + 3) & ~3) - 1)
> };
Powered by blists - more mailing lists