lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <164975609097.5724.17794967869431754911.kvalo@kernel.org> Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2022 09:34:53 +0000 (UTC) From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@...nel.org> To: cgel.zte@...il.com Cc: davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@....com.cn>, Zeal Robot <zealci@....com.cn> Subject: Re: [PATCH] wlcore: using pm_runtime_resume_and_get instead of pm_runtime_get_sync cgel.zte@...il.com wrote: > From: Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@....com.cn> > > Using pm_runtime_resume_and_get is more appropriate > for simplifing code > > Reported-by: Zeal Robot <zealci@....com.cn> > Signed-off-by: Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@....com.cn> I'll rename this to: wlcore: debugfs: use pm_runtime_resume_and_get() instead of pm_runtime_get_sync() -- https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/patch/20220408081205.2494512-1-chi.minghao@zte.com.cn/ https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches
Powered by blists - more mailing lists