lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <164975609097.5724.17794967869431754911.kvalo@kernel.org>
Date:   Tue, 12 Apr 2022 09:34:53 +0000 (UTC)
From:   Kalle Valo <kvalo@...nel.org>
To:     cgel.zte@...il.com
Cc:     davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org,
        linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@....com.cn>,
        Zeal Robot <zealci@....com.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] wlcore: using pm_runtime_resume_and_get instead of
 pm_runtime_get_sync

cgel.zte@...il.com wrote:

> From: Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@....com.cn>
> 
> Using pm_runtime_resume_and_get is more appropriate
> for simplifing code
> 
> Reported-by: Zeal Robot <zealci@....com.cn>
> Signed-off-by: Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@....com.cn>

I'll rename this to:

wlcore: debugfs: use pm_runtime_resume_and_get() instead of pm_runtime_get_sync()

-- 
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/patch/20220408081205.2494512-1-chi.minghao@zte.com.cn/

https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ