[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <24581ebb-e952-d1d8-8d64-a51c94e29bc8@mojatatu.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2022 06:54:43 -0400
From: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>
To: Boris Sukholitko <boris.sukholitko@...adcom.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>,
"Gustavo A . R . Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>,
Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
zhang kai <zhangkaiheb@....com>,
Yoshiki Komachi <komachi.yoshiki@...il.com>,
Ilya Lifshits <ilya.lifshits@...adcom.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/5] flower: match on the number of vlan tags
On 2022-04-11 10:56, Boris Sukholitko wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 11, 2022 at 10:07:14AM -0400, Jamal Hadi Salim wrote:
>> On 2022-04-11 09:30, Boris Sukholitko wrote:
>>> Hi,
[..]
>> Can you please provide more elaborate example of more than 1 vlan?
>
> Perusing our logs, we have redirect rules such as:
>
> tc filter add dev $GPON ingress flower num_of_vlans $N \
> action mirred egress redirect dev $DEV
>
Please add in the commit logs.
> where N can range from 0 to 3 and $DEV is the function of $N.
>
Also in the commit log, very specific to GPON. I have seen upto
4 in some telco environment.
> Also there are rules setting skb mark based on the number of vlans:
>
> tc filter add dev $GPON ingress flower num_of_vlans $N vlan_prio \
> $P action skbedit mark $M
>
Yep makes sense.
>> Where would the line be drawn:
>> Is it max of two vlans?
>
> We have seen the maximum of 3 vlans.
>
>> Is there potential of <=X, meaning matching of upto X Vlans?
>>
>
> We've managed to get by without such feature somehow :)
If needed should be extensible. You already have ability to count, so
adding inequality check should not be hard to add when needed.
cheers,
jamal
Powered by blists - more mailing lists