netdev - Re: [PATCH RFC net-next 03/13] net: bridge: minor refactor of br

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 13 Apr 2022 11:22:23 +0200
From:   Joachim Wiberg <troglobit@...il.com>
To:     Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@...ckwall.org>,
        Roopa Prabhu <roopa@...dia.com>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, bridge@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Tobias Waldekranz <tobias@...dekranz.com>,
        Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC net-next 03/13] net: bridge: minor refactor of br_setlink() for readability

On Tue, Apr 12, 2022 at 21:36, Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@...ckwall.org> wrote:
> On 11/04/2022 16:38, Joachim Wiberg wrote:
>> The br_setlink() function extracts the struct net_bridge pointer a bit
>> sloppy.  It's easy to interpret the code wrong.  This patch attempts to
>> clear things up a bit.
> I think you can make it more straight-forward, remove the first br = netdev_priv
> and do something like (completely untested):
> ...
> struct net_bridge_port *p = NULL;
> ...
> if (netif_is_bridge_master(dev)) {
>  br = netdev_priv(dev);
> } else {
>  p = br_port_get_rtnl(dev);
>  if (WARN_ON(!p))
> 	return -EINVAL;
>  br = p->br;
> }
>
> So br is always and only set in this block.

Yes, this is much better, thank you!  I took the misguided approach of
minmizing my change.  I'll update and include in the non-RFC patch
series I send next.