[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220413125915.GA667752@hoboy.vegasvil.org>
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2022 05:59:15 -0700
From: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
To: Tan Tee Min <tee.min.tan@...el.com>
Cc: Giuseppe Cavallaro <peppe.cavallaro@...com>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...com>,
Jose Abreu <joabreu@...opsys.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
Rayagond Kokatanur <rayagond@...avyalabs.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Voon Wei Feng <weifeng.voon@...el.com>,
Wong Vee Khee <vee.khee.wong@...el.com>,
Song Yoong Siang <yoong.siang.song@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 1/1] net: stmmac: add fsleep() in HW Rx timestamp
checking loop
On Wed, Apr 13, 2022 at 12:01:15PM +0800, Tan Tee Min wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac4_descs.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac4_descs.c
> index d3b4765c1a5b..289bf26a6105 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac4_descs.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac4_descs.c
> @@ -279,10 +279,11 @@ static int dwmac4_wrback_get_rx_timestamp_status(void *desc, void *next_desc,
> /* Check if timestamp is OK from context descriptor */
> do {
> ret = dwmac4_rx_check_timestamp(next_desc);
> - if (ret < 0)
> + if (ret <= 0)
> goto exit;
> i++;
>
> + fsleep(1);
This is nutty. Why isn't this code using proper deferral mechanisms
like work or kthread?
> } while ((ret == 1) && (i < 10));
>
> if (i == 10)
> --
> 2.25.1
>
Thanks,
Richard
Powered by blists - more mailing lists