netdev - Re: [PATCH bpf-next 0/5] bpf trampoline for arm64

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87mtgorfxh.fsf@toke.dk>
Date:   Wed, 13 Apr 2022 20:34:02 +0200
From:   Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...nel.org>
To:     Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@...wei.com>, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Zi Shen Lim <zlim.lnx@...il.com>,
        Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
        Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
        Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
        John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
        KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>, x86@...nel.org, hpa@...or.com,
        Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
        Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@...een.com>,
        Peter Collingbourne <pcc@...gle.com>,
        Daniel Kiss <daniel.kiss@....com>,
        Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
        Steven Price <steven.price@....com>,
        Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@...il.com>,
        Delyan Kratunov <delyank@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 0/5] bpf trampoline for arm64

Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@...wei.com> writes:

> Add bpf trampoline support for arm64. Most of the logic is the same as
> x86.
>
> Tested on qemu, result:
>  #55 fentry_fexit:OK
>  #56 fentry_test:OK
>  #58 fexit_sleep:OK
>  #59 fexit_stress:OK
>  #60 fexit_test:OK
>  #67 get_func_args_test:OK
>  #68 get_func_ip_test:OK
>  #101 modify_return:OK

Yay! Great to see this; thanks a bunch for tackling it! :)

-Toke