[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220413062131.363740-2-liujian56@huawei.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2022 14:21:30 +0800
From: Liu Jian <liujian56@...wei.com>
To: <ast@...nel.org>, <daniel@...earbox.net>, <andrii@...nel.org>,
<kafai@...com>, <songliubraving@...com>, <yhs@...com>,
<john.fastabend@...il.com>, <kpsingh@...nel.org>,
<davem@...emloft.net>, <kuba@...nel.org>, <sdf@...gle.com>,
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <bpf@...r.kernel.org>
CC: <liujian56@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf v2 1/2] net: Enlarge offset check value from 0xffff to INT_MAX in bpf_skb_load_bytes
The data length of skb frags + frag_list may be greater than 0xffff,
and skb_header_pointer can not handle negative offset and negative len.
So here INT_MAX is used to check the validity of offset and len.
Add the same change to the related function skb_store_bytes.
Fixes: 05c74e5e53f6 ("bpf: add bpf_skb_load_bytes helper")
Signed-off-by: Liu Jian <liujian56@...wei.com>
Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>
---
v1->v2: change nothing, only add Acked-by tag
net/core/filter.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/core/filter.c b/net/core/filter.c
index 64470a727ef7..1571b6bc51ea 100644
--- a/net/core/filter.c
+++ b/net/core/filter.c
@@ -1687,7 +1687,7 @@ BPF_CALL_5(bpf_skb_store_bytes, struct sk_buff *, skb, u32, offset,
if (unlikely(flags & ~(BPF_F_RECOMPUTE_CSUM | BPF_F_INVALIDATE_HASH)))
return -EINVAL;
- if (unlikely(offset > 0xffff))
+ if (unlikely(offset > INT_MAX || len > INT_MAX))
return -EFAULT;
if (unlikely(bpf_try_make_writable(skb, offset + len)))
return -EFAULT;
@@ -1722,7 +1722,7 @@ BPF_CALL_4(bpf_skb_load_bytes, const struct sk_buff *, skb, u32, offset,
{
void *ptr;
- if (unlikely(offset > 0xffff))
+ if (unlikely(offset > INT_MAX || len > INT_MAX))
goto err_clear;
ptr = skb_header_pointer(skb, offset, len, to);
--
2.17.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists