[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220415154626.345767-5-vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2022 18:46:24 +0300
From: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 4/6] net: dsa: avoid one dsa_to_port() in dsa_slave_change_mtu
We could retrieve the cpu_dp pointer directly from the "dp" we already
have, no need to resort to dsa_to_port(ds, port).
This change also removes the need for an "int port", so that is also
deleted.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
---
net/dsa/slave.c | 5 +----
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/dsa/slave.c b/net/dsa/slave.c
index da234c4b7daa..3ff8647be619 100644
--- a/net/dsa/slave.c
+++ b/net/dsa/slave.c
@@ -1807,10 +1807,9 @@ int dsa_slave_change_mtu(struct net_device *dev, int new_mtu)
struct net_device *master = dsa_slave_to_master(dev);
struct dsa_port *dp = dsa_slave_to_port(dev);
struct dsa_slave_priv *p = netdev_priv(dev);
+ struct dsa_port *cpu_dp = dp->cpu_dp;
struct dsa_switch *ds = p->dp->ds;
struct dsa_port *other_dp;
- struct dsa_port *cpu_dp;
- int port = p->dp->index;
int largest_mtu = 0;
int new_master_mtu;
int old_master_mtu;
@@ -1843,8 +1842,6 @@ int dsa_slave_change_mtu(struct net_device *dev, int new_mtu)
largest_mtu = slave_mtu;
}
- cpu_dp = dsa_to_port(ds, port)->cpu_dp;
-
mtu_limit = min_t(int, master->max_mtu, dev->max_mtu);
old_master_mtu = master->mtu;
new_master_mtu = largest_mtu + dsa_tag_protocol_overhead(cpu_dp->tag_ops);
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists