lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <9dfffc57-4733-37c9-5668-97b06a40a202@intel.com> Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2022 13:53:20 -0700 From: Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com> To: "Keller, Jacob E" <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>, ivecera <ivecera@...hat.com>, "Fijalkowski, Maciej" <maciej.fijalkowski@...el.com> CC: Fei Liu <feliu@...hat.com>, "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, mschmidt <mschmidt@...hat.com>, Brett Creeley <brett.creeley@...el.com>, open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "moderated list:INTEL ETHERNET DRIVERS" <intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net> Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net] ice: Protect vf_state check by cfg_lock in ice_vc_process_vf_msg() On 4/15/2022 11:31 AM, Keller, Jacob E wrote: > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Ivan Vecera <ivecera@...hat.com> >> Sent: Friday, April 15, 2022 9:39 AM >> To: Fijalkowski, Maciej <maciej.fijalkowski@...el.com> >> Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org; Fei Liu <feliu@...hat.com>; moderated list:INTEL >> ETHERNET DRIVERS <intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org>; mschmidt >> <mschmidt@...hat.com>; Brett Creeley <brett.creeley@...el.com>; open list >> <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>; Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>; Paolo Abeni >> <pabeni@...hat.com>; David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net> >> Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net] ice: Protect vf_state check by cfg_lock in >> ice_vc_process_vf_msg() >> >> On Fri, 15 Apr 2022 13:55:02 +0200 >> Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@...el.com> wrote: >> >>> On Wed, Apr 13, 2022 at 09:22:59AM +0200, Ivan Vecera wrote: >>>> Previous patch labelled "ice: Fix incorrect locking in >>>> ice_vc_process_vf_msg()" fixed an issue with ignored messages >>> tiny tiny nit: double space after " >>> Also, has mentioned patch landed onto some tree so that we could provide >>> SHA-1 of it? If not, then maybe squashing this one with the mentioned one >>> would make sense? >> Well, that commit were already tested and now it is present in Tony's queue >> but not in upstream yet. It is not problem to squash together but the first >> was about ignored VF messages and this one is about race and I didn't want >> to make single patch with huge description that cover both issues. >> But as I said, no problem to squash if needed. >> >> Thx, >> Ivan > I'm fine with either squashing or keeping them as separate changes. Either way sounds ok to me as they are different types of changes. Thanks, Tony
Powered by blists - more mailing lists