[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c503b9b8-062d-d8c8-1d9f-106602dd31c4@quicinc.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2022 14:56:29 +0800
From: Wen Gong <quic_wgong@...cinc.com>
To: Benjamin Poirier <benjamin.poirier@...il.com>,
Yihao Han <hanyihao@...o.com>
CC: Kalle Valo <kvalo@...nel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, <ath11k@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <kernel@...o.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ath11k: simplify if-if to if-else
On 4/15/2022 2:16 PM, Benjamin Poirier wrote:
> On 2022-04-14 02:20 -0700, Yihao Han wrote:
...
> It seems there is no synchronization around is_reset but is it
> guaranteed that it cannot be changed by ath11k_core_reset() between the
> two tests? I'm not familiar with the driver.
ath11k_core_reset() has logic to avoid muti-reset in the same time.
it means it has one recovery work doing for each time.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists