lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <c503b9b8-062d-d8c8-1d9f-106602dd31c4@quicinc.com> Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2022 14:56:29 +0800 From: Wen Gong <quic_wgong@...cinc.com> To: Benjamin Poirier <benjamin.poirier@...il.com>, Yihao Han <hanyihao@...o.com> CC: Kalle Valo <kvalo@...nel.org>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, <ath11k@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <kernel@...o.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH] ath11k: simplify if-if to if-else On 4/15/2022 2:16 PM, Benjamin Poirier wrote: > On 2022-04-14 02:20 -0700, Yihao Han wrote: ... > It seems there is no synchronization around is_reset but is it > guaranteed that it cannot be changed by ath11k_core_reset() between the > two tests? I'm not familiar with the driver. ath11k_core_reset() has logic to avoid muti-reset in the same time. it means it has one recovery work doing for each time.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists