lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CAOvjArSb4avVaV25925z+e5eKW89Q6k+AsPSq1yS+kroG_a=ww@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2022 13:56:46 +0530 From: Arun Ajith S <aajith@...sta.com> To: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com> Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, dsahern@...nel.org, yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, corbet@....net, prestwoj@...il.com, gilligan@...sta.com, noureddine@...sta.com, gk@...sta.com Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v5] net/ipv6: Introduce accept_unsolicited_na knob to implement router-side changes for RFC9131 Sorry, it wasn't the mailer. The rst file in my patch was missing tabs. I have fixed it and verified the generated HTML is correct. I'll post v6 with the fix. On Fri, Apr 15, 2022 at 1:09 PM Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com> wrote: > > On 4/15/22 12:42, Arun Ajith S wrote: > > +accept_unsolicited_na - BOOLEAN > > + Add a new neighbour cache entry in STALE state for routers on receiving an > > + unsolicited neighbour advertisement with target link-layer address option > > + specified. This is as per router-side behavior documented in RFC9131. > > + This has lower precedence than drop_unsolicited_na. > > + > > + ==== ====== ====== ============================================== > > + drop accept fwding behaviour > > + ---- ------ ------ ---------------------------------------------- > > + 1 X X Drop NA packet and don't pass up the stack > > + 0 0 X Pass NA packet up the stack, don't update NC > > + 0 1 0 Pass NA packet up the stack, don't update NC > > + 0 1 1 Pass NA packet up the stack, and add a STALE > > + NC entry > > + ==== ====== ====== ============================================== > > + > > Hi, > > Building htmldocs with this patch, there are no more warnings from v4, but > I don't see the table above generated in the output. I guess due to > whitespace-mangling issues on your mailer, because the table syntax alignment > (the =-s) don't match the contents/cells. > > Thanks. > > -- > An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara
Powered by blists - more mailing lists