netdev - [PATCH net-next 09/10] tcp: add drop reasons to tcp_rcv_synsent_state

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 15 Apr 2022 17:10:47 -0700
From:   Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:     "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Cc:     netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 09/10] tcp: add drop reasons to tcp_rcv_synsent_state_process()

From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>

Re-use existing reasons.

Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
---
 net/ipv4/tcp_input.c | 15 +++++++++------
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
index cd9f5c39f85a042751ef78132860a2a6cc96bccc..339cc3d40745a0ea2a9f66b03dfda5aa6800d4a2 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
@@ -6144,6 +6144,7 @@ static int tcp_rcv_synsent_state_process(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb,
 	struct tcp_fastopen_cookie foc = { .len = -1 };
 	int saved_clamp = tp->rx_opt.mss_clamp;
 	bool fastopen_fail;
+	SKB_DR(reason);
 
 	tcp_parse_options(sock_net(sk), skb, &tp->rx_opt, 0, &foc);
 	if (tp->rx_opt.saw_tstamp && tp->rx_opt.rcv_tsecr)
@@ -6198,9 +6199,10 @@ static int tcp_rcv_synsent_state_process(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb,
 		 *    See note below!
 		 *                                        --ANK(990513)
 		 */
-		if (!th->syn)
+		if (!th->syn) {
+			SKB_DR_SET(reason, TCP_FLAGS);
 			goto discard_and_undo;
-
+		}
 		/* rfc793:
 		 *   "If the SYN bit is on ...
 		 *    are acceptable then ...
@@ -6291,15 +6293,16 @@ static int tcp_rcv_synsent_state_process(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb,
 		 *
 		 *      Otherwise (no ACK) drop the segment and return."
 		 */
-
+		SKB_DR_SET(reason, TCP_RESET);
 		goto discard_and_undo;
 	}
 
 	/* PAWS check. */
 	if (tp->rx_opt.ts_recent_stamp && tp->rx_opt.saw_tstamp &&
-	    tcp_paws_reject(&tp->rx_opt, 0))
+	    tcp_paws_reject(&tp->rx_opt, 0)) {
+		SKB_DR_SET(reason, TCP_RFC7323_PAWS);
 		goto discard_and_undo;
-
+	}
 	if (th->syn) {
 		/* We see SYN without ACK. It is attempt of
 		 * simultaneous connect with crossed SYNs.
@@ -6358,7 +6361,7 @@ static int tcp_rcv_synsent_state_process(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb,
 discard_and_undo:
 	tcp_clear_options(&tp->rx_opt);
 	tp->rx_opt.mss_clamp = saved_clamp;
-	tcp_drop(sk, skb);
+	tcp_drop_reason(sk, skb, reason);
 	return 0;
 
 reset_and_undo:
-- 
2.36.0.rc0.470.gd361397f0d-goog