[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAM_iQpXb=-hdGbdbpTbDBGJKyYPhn3SxXUUowHg5gTy20W=iiQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2022 15:30:01 -0700
From: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc: "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>, netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net_sched: make qdisc_reset() smaller
On Wed, Apr 13, 2022 at 6:11 PM Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> wrote:
>
> From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
>
> For some unknown reason qdisc_reset() is using
> a convoluted way of freeing two lists of skbs.
>
> Use __skb_queue_purge() instead.
[...]
>
> - skb_queue_walk_safe(&qdisc->gso_skb, skb, tmp) {
> - __skb_unlink(skb, &qdisc->gso_skb);
> - kfree_skb_list(skb);
Isn't it precisely because of this kfree_skb_list()?
Thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists