lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <87v8v6477g.fsf@intel.com> Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2022 13:44:35 -0400 From: Vinicius Costa Gomes <vinicius.gomes@...el.com> To: Jeff Evanson <jeff.evanson@...il.com>, Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>, Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Cc: jeff.evanson@....com, jeff.evanson@...il.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Trigger proper interrupts in igc_xsk_wakeup Jeff Evanson <jeff.evanson@...il.com> writes: > in igc_xsk_wakeup, trigger the proper interrupt based on whether flags > contains XDP_WAKEUP_RX and/or XDP_WAKEUP_TX > > Signed-off-by: Jeff Evanson <jeff.evanson@....com> > --- > drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_main.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++------ > 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_main.c > index a36a18c84aeb..d706de95dc06 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_main.c > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_main.c > @@ -6073,7 +6073,7 @@ static void igc_trigger_rxtxq_interrupt(struct igc_adapter *adapter, > int igc_xsk_wakeup(struct net_device *dev, u32 queue_id, u32 flags) > { > struct igc_adapter *adapter = netdev_priv(dev); > - struct igc_q_vector *q_vector; > + struct igc_q_vector *txq_vector = 0, *rxq_vector = 0; > struct igc_ring *ring; > > if (test_bit(__IGC_DOWN, &adapter->state)) > @@ -6082,17 +6082,35 @@ int igc_xsk_wakeup(struct net_device *dev, u32 queue_id, u32 flags) > if (!igc_xdp_is_enabled(adapter)) > return -ENXIO; > > - if (queue_id >= adapter->num_rx_queues) > - return -EINVAL; > + if (flags & XDP_WAKEUP_RX) { > + if (queue_id >= adapter->num_rx_queues) > + return -EINVAL; > > - ring = adapter->rx_ring[queue_id]; > + ring = adapter->rx_ring[queue_id]; > + if (!ring->xsk_pool) > + return -ENXIO; > > - if (!ring->xsk_pool) > - return -ENXIO; > + rxq_vector = ring->q_vector; > + } > + > + if (flags & XDP_WAKEUP_TX) { > + if (queue_id >= adapter->num_tx_queues) > + return -EINVAL; > + > + ring = adapter->tx_ring[queue_id]; > + if (!ring->xsk_pool) > + return -ENXIO; > + > + txq_vector = ring->q_vector; > + } > + > + if (rxq_vector && > + !napi_if_scheduled_mark_missed(&rxq_vector->napi)) > + igc_trigger_rxtxq_interrupt(adapter, rxq_vector); > > - q_vector = adapter->q_vector[queue_id]; > - if (!napi_if_scheduled_mark_missed(&q_vector->napi)) > - igc_trigger_rxtxq_interrupt(adapter, q_vector); > + if (txq_vector && txq_vector != rxq_vector && > + !napi_if_scheduled_mark_missed(&txq_vector->napi)) > + igc_trigger_rxtxq_interrupt(adapter, txq_vector); Two things: - My imagination was not able to produce a scenario where this commit would solve any problems. Can you explain better the case where the current code would cause the wrong interrupt to be generated (or miss generating an interrupt)? (this should be in the commit message) - I think that with this patch applied, there would cases (both TX and RX flags set) that we cause two writes into the EICS register. That could cause unnecessary wakeups. > > return 0; > } > -- > 2.17.1 > Cheers, -- Vinicius
Powered by blists - more mailing lists