[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Yl6uLbhB4tNhN/Ld@lunn.ch>
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2022 14:42:21 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@...rochip.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
hkallweit1@...il.com, linux@...linux.org.uk, davem@...emloft.net,
kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com,
richardcochran@...il.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next 2/2] net: phy: micrel: Implement
set/get_adj_latency for lan8814
On Tue, Apr 19, 2022 at 10:37:04AM +0200, Horatiu Vultur wrote:
> The lan8814 driver supports adjustments of the latency in the silicon
> based on the speed and direction, therefore implement set/get_adj_latency
> to adjust the HW.
>
> Signed-off-by: Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@...rochip.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/phy/micrel.c | 87 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 87 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/micrel.c b/drivers/net/phy/micrel.c
> index 96840695debd..099d1ecd6dad 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/phy/micrel.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/phy/micrel.c
> @@ -120,6 +120,15 @@
> #define PTP_TIMESTAMP_EN_PDREQ_ BIT(2)
> #define PTP_TIMESTAMP_EN_PDRES_ BIT(3)
>
> +#define PTP_RX_LATENCY_1000 0x0224
> +#define PTP_TX_LATENCY_1000 0x0225
> +
> +#define PTP_RX_LATENCY_100 0x0222
> +#define PTP_TX_LATENCY_100 0x0223
> +
> +#define PTP_RX_LATENCY_10 0x0220
> +#define PTP_TX_LATENCY_10 0x0221
> +
> #define PTP_TX_PARSE_L2_ADDR_EN 0x0284
> #define PTP_RX_PARSE_L2_ADDR_EN 0x0244
>
> @@ -208,6 +217,16 @@
> #define PTP_TSU_INT_STS_PTP_RX_TS_OVRFL_INT_ BIT(1)
> #define PTP_TSU_INT_STS_PTP_RX_TS_EN_ BIT(0)
>
> +/* Represents the reset value of the latency registers,
> + * The values are express in ns
> + */
> +#define LAN8814_RX_10_LATENCY 8874
> +#define LAN8814_TX_10_LATENCY 11850
> +#define LAN8814_RX_100_LATENCY 2346
> +#define LAN8814_TX_100_LATENCY 705
> +#define LAN8814_RX_1000_LATENCY 429
> +#define LAN8814_TX_1000_LATENCY 201
> +
> /* PHY Control 1 */
> #define MII_KSZPHY_CTRL_1 0x1e
> #define KSZ8081_CTRL1_MDIX_STAT BIT(4)
> @@ -2657,6 +2676,72 @@ static int lan8804_config_init(struct phy_device *phydev)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static int lan8814_set_adj_latency(struct phy_device *phydev,
> + enum ethtool_link_mode_bit_indices link_mode,
> + s32 rx, s32 tx)
> +{
> + switch (link_mode) {
> + case ETHTOOL_LINK_MODE_10baseT_Half_BIT:
> + case ETHTOOL_LINK_MODE_10baseT_Full_BIT:
> + rx += LAN8814_RX_10_LATENCY;
> + tx += LAN8814_TX_10_LATENCY;
> + lanphy_write_page_reg(phydev, 5, PTP_RX_LATENCY_10, rx);
> + lanphy_write_page_reg(phydev, 5, PTP_TX_LATENCY_10, tx);
It is not ideal that the user sees an entry for both link modes X and
X+1 in your file, and that writing to link mode X magically also
changes X+1.
I'm not sure there is anything you can do about this in a generic
implementation, so you at least need to document it in sysfs.
What about range checks? I can pass 32764 as an rx delay, which when
added to PTP_RX_LATENCY_10=0x0220 is going to wrap around and be
negative.
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists