[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <21796697-e4e1-bf51-76fc-bdb0e28d6b60@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2022 15:37:47 +0200
From: Alaa Mohamed <eng.alaamohamedsoliman.am@...il.com>
To: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>
Cc: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...ia.fr>, outreachy@...ts.linux.dev,
jesse.brandeburg@...el.com, anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com,
davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com,
intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] intel: igb: igb_ethtool.c: Convert kmap() to
kmap_local_page()
On ١٩/٤/٢٠٢٢ ٠٠:١٩, Ira Weiny wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 16, 2022 at 03:14:57PM +0200, Alaa Mohamed wrote:
>> On ١٦/٤/٢٠٢٢ ١٣:٣١, Julia Lawall wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Sat, 16 Apr 2022, Alaa Mohamed wrote:
>>
>>
>> Convert kmap() to kmap_local_page()
>>
>> With kmap_local_page(), the mapping is per thread, CPU local and not
>> globally visible.
>>
>> It's not clearer.
>>
>> I mean this " fix kunmap_local path value to take address of the mapped
>> page" be more clearer
>>
>> This is a general statement about the function. You
>> need to explain why it is appropriate to use it here. Unless it is the
>> case that all calls to kmap should be converted to call kmap_local_page.
>>
>> It's required to convert all calls kmap to kmap_local_page. So, I don't
>> what should the commit message be?
>>
>> Is this will be good :
>>
>> "kmap_local_page() was recently developed as a replacement for kmap().
>> The
>> kmap_local_page() creates a mapping which is restricted to local use by a
>> single thread of execution. "
>>
> I think I am missing some thread context here. I'm not sure who said what
> above. So I'm going to start over.
>
> Alaa,
>
> It is important to remember that a good commit message says 2 things.
>
> 1) What is the problem you are trying to solve
> 2) Overview of the solution
>
> First off I understand your frustration. In my opinion fixes and clean ups
> like this are very hard to write good commit messages for because so often the
> code diff seems so self explanatory. However, each code change comes at the
> identification of a problem. And remember that 'problem' does not always mean
> a bug fix.
>
> The deprecation of kmap() may not seem like a problem. I mean why can't we
> just leave kmap() as it is? It works right?
>
> But the problem is that the kmap (highmem) interface has become stale and its
> original purpose was targeted toward large memory systems with 32 bit kernels.
> There are very few systems being run like that any longer.
>
> So how do we clean up the kmap interface to be more useful to the kernel
> community now that 32 bit kernels with highmem are so rare?
>
> The community has identified that a first step of that is to move away from and
> eventually remove the kmap() call. This is due to the call being incorrectly
> used to create long term mappings. Most calls to kmap() are not used
> incorrectly but those call sites needed something in between kmap() and
> kmap_atmoic(). That call is kmap_local_page().
>
> Now that kmap_local_page() exists the kmap() calls can be audited and most (I
> hope most)[1] can be replaced with kmap_local_page().
>
> The change you have below is correct. But it lacks a good commit message. We
> need to cover the 2 points above.
>
> 1) Julia is asking why you needed to do this change. What is the
> problem or reason for this change? (Ira told you to is not a good
> reason. ;-)
>
> PS In fact me telling you to may actually be a very bad reason...
> j/k ;-)
>
> 2) Why is this solution ok as part of the deprecation and removal of
> kmap()?
>
> A final note; the 2 above points don't need a lot of text. Here I used
> 2 simple sentences.
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220124015409.807587-2-ira.weiny@intel.com/
>
> I hope this helps,
> Ira
>
> [1] But not all... some uses of kmap() have been identified as being pretty
> complex.
Thanks a lot for detailed explaining , yes you help me a lot.
Thanks again,
Alaa
>> julia
>>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Alaa Mohamed <eng.alaamohamedsoliman.am@...il.com>
>> ---
>> changes in V2:
>> fix kunmap_local path value to take address of the mapped page.
>> ---
>> changes in V3:
>> edit commit message to be clearer
>> ---
>> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_ethtool.c | 4 ++--
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_ethtool.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_ethtool.c
>> index 2a5782063f4c..c14fc871dd41 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_ethtool.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_ethtool.c
>> @@ -1798,14 +1798,14 @@ static int igb_check_lbtest_frame(struct igb_rx_buffer *rx_buffer,
>>
>> frame_size >>= 1;
>>
>> - data = kmap(rx_buffer->page);
>> + data = kmap_local_page(rx_buffer->page);
>>
>> if (data[3] != 0xFF ||
>> data[frame_size + 10] != 0xBE ||
>> data[frame_size + 12] != 0xAF)
>> match = false;
>>
>> - kunmap(rx_buffer->page);
>> + kunmap_local(data);
>>
>> return match;
>> }
>> --
>> 2.35.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists