netdev - Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net] ice: Protect vf_state check by cfg_lock in ice_vc_process_vf

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20220419162302.60378ede@ceranb>
Date:   Tue, 19 Apr 2022 16:23:02 +0200
From:   Ivan Vecera <ivecera@...hat.com>
To:     Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>
Cc:     Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@...el.com>,
        Fei Liu <feliu@...hat.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        <mschmidt@...hat.com>, "Brett Creeley" <brett@...sando.io>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "moderated list:INTEL ETHERNET DRIVERS" 
        <intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net] ice: Protect vf_state check by
 cfg_lock in ice_vc_process_vf_msg()

On Mon, 18 Apr 2022 11:10:30 -0700
Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com> wrote:

> > If you want to leave the code as is and remove this from the patch
> > let me know and I will send v2.  
> 
> The change itself looks ok to me, but for net patches, we should fix the 
> issue without introducing other changes. A v2 without this change would 
> be great; feel free to submit this change to -next after I've applied 
> the v2 for this patch.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Tony
Agree, sending v2.

Thanks,
Ivan