[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220420165457.kd5yz6a6itqfcysj@skbuf>
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2022 19:54:57 +0300
From: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
To: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: IPv6 multicast with VRF
Hi,
I don't have experience with either IPv6 multicast or VRF, yet I need to
send some IPv6 multicast packets from a device enslaved to a VRF, and I
don't really know what's wrong with the routing table setup.
The system is configured in the following way:
ip link set dev eth0 up
# The kernel kindly creates a ff00::/8 route for IPv6 multicast traffic
# in the local table, and I think this is what makes multicast route
# lookups find the egress device.
ip -6 route show table local
local ::1 dev lo proto kernel metric 0 pref medium
local fe80::204:9fff:fe05:f4ab dev eth0 proto kernel metric 0 pref medium
multicast ff00::/8 dev eth0 proto kernel metric 256 pref medium
ip -6 route get ff02::1
multicast ff02::1 dev eth0 table local proto kernel src fe80::204:9fff:fe05:f4ab metric 256 pref medium
ip link add dev vrf0 type vrf table 3 && ip link set dev vrf0 up
ip -4 route add table 3 unreachable default metric 4278198272
ip -6 route add table 3 unreachable default metric 4278198272
ip link set dev eth0 master vrf0
The problem seems to be that, although the "ff00::/8 dev eth0" route
migrates from table 255 to table 3, route lookups after this point fail
to find it and return -ENETUNREACH (ip6_null_entry).
ip -6 route show table local
local ::1 dev lo proto kernel metric 0 pref medium
ip -6 route show table main
::1 dev lo proto kernel metric 256 pref medium
ip -6 route show table 3
local fe80::204:9fff:fe05:f4ab dev eth0 proto kernel metric 0 pref medium
fe80::/64 dev eth0 proto kernel metric 256 pref medium
multicast ff00::/8 dev eth0 proto kernel metric 256 pref medium
unreachable default dev lo metric 4278198272 pref medium
ip -6 route get ff02::1
RTNETLINK answers: Network is unreachable
ip -6 route get vrf vrf0 ff02::1
RTNETLINK answers: Network is unreachable
I'm not exactly sure what is missing?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists