[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220420090214.2588618-1-chi.minghao@zte.com.cn>
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2022 09:02:14 +0000
From: cgel.zte@...il.com
To: kvalo@...nel.org
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org,
linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@....com.cn>,
Zeal Robot <zealci@....com.cn>
Subject: [PATCH] wl12xx: using pm_runtime_resume_and_get instead of pm_runtime_get_sync
From: Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@....com.cn>
Using pm_runtime_resume_and_get() to replace pm_runtime_get_sync and
pm_runtime_put_noidle. This change is just to simplify the code, no
actual functional changes.
Reported-by: Zeal Robot <zealci@....com.cn>
Signed-off-by: Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@....com.cn>
---
drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/tx.c | 6 ++----
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/tx.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/tx.c
index e20e18cd04ae..7bd3ce2f0804 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/tx.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/tx.c
@@ -855,11 +855,9 @@ void wl1271_tx_work(struct work_struct *work)
int ret;
mutex_lock(&wl->mutex);
- ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(wl->dev);
- if (ret < 0) {
- pm_runtime_put_noidle(wl->dev);
+ ret = pm_runtime_resume_and_get(wl->dev);
+ if (ret < 0)
goto out;
- }
ret = wlcore_tx_work_locked(wl);
if (ret < 0) {
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists