[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CABb+yY3uRxKdQ_Q-yvWipmOqLNbJXmJ141oYJnq1di_Yu66T_Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2022 09:22:47 -0500
From: Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@...il.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Cc: Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Devicetree List <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
"<netdev@...r.kernel.org>" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Alex Elder <elder@...nel.org>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: mailbox: qcom-ipcc: simplify the example
On Wed, Apr 20, 2022 at 3:42 AM Krzysztof Kozlowski
<krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> On 02/04/2022 17:55, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > Consumer examples in the bindings of resource providers are trivial,
> > useless and duplicating code. Additionally the incomplete qcom,smp2p
> > example triggers DT schema warnings.
> >
> > Cleanup the example by removing the consumer part and fixing the
> > indentation to DT schema convention.
> >
> > Reported-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
>
> Jassi,
> Do you plan to pick this mailbox patch?
>
Yes, I do. I am ok too, if you want it through some other tree as a
part of some bigger patchset.
thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists