netdev - Re: [PATCH] tcp: md5: incorrect tcp_header

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 20 Apr 2022 17:37:48 -0700
From:   Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
To:     Francesco Ruggeri <fruggeri@...sta.com>
Cc:     Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>,
        Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>,
        David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tcp: md5: incorrect tcp_header_len for incoming connections

On Wed, Apr 20, 2022 at 5:32 PM Francesco Ruggeri <fruggeri@...sta.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 20, 2022 at 5:20 PM Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 20, 2022 at 4:57 PM Francesco Ruggeri <fruggeri@...sta.com> wrote:
> > This seems like a day-0 bug, right ?
> >
> > Do you agree on adding
> >
> > Fixes: cfb6eeb4c860 ("[TCP]: MD5 Signature Option (RFC2385) support.")
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> I also think it is a day-0 bug. Should I resubmit with "Fixes:" ?

I think so. It will make things a bit easier for network maintainers,
because I do not think patchwork catches Fixes: tags added during code review.

Also please add the net prefix, as in [PATCH v2 net] title  (look at
the warning at https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/patch/20220420235659.830155EC021C@us226.sjc.aristanetworks.com/
)

Thanks.