netdev - Re: [PATCH net v3] tcp: ensure to use the most recently sent skb when filling the rate sample

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 22 Apr 2022 14:06:40 -0700
From:   Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
To:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc:     Pengcheng Yang <yangpc@...gsu.com>,
        Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@...gle.com>,
        netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>,
        David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v3] tcp: ensure to use the most recently sent skb when
 filling the rate sample

On Fri, Apr 22, 2022 at 1:37 PM Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 20 Apr 2022 10:34:41 +0800 Pengcheng Yang wrote:
> > If an ACK (s)acks multiple skbs, we favor the information
> > from the most recently sent skb by choosing the skb with
> > the highest prior_delivered count. But in the interval
> > between receiving ACKs, we send multiple skbs with the same
> > prior_delivered, because the tp->delivered only changes
> > when we receive an ACK.
> >
> > We used RACK's solution, copying tcp_rack_sent_after() as
> > tcp_skb_sent_after() helper to determine "which packet was
> > sent last?". Later, we will use tcp_skb_sent_after() instead
> > in RACK.
> >
> > Fixes: b9f64820fb22 ("tcp: track data delivery rate for a TCP connection")
> > Signed-off-by: Pengcheng Yang <yangpc@...gsu.com>
> > Cc: Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@...gle.com>
> > Cc: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
>
> Somehow this patch got marked as archived in patchwork. Reviving it now.
>
> Eric, Neal, ack?

Oops, right, thanks !

Reviewed-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>