netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v2] selftests: net: vrf_strict_mode_test: add support to select a test to run

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <c2eb6a8a-531e-7a6e-267c-23577f2e95e8@nvidia.com>
Date:   Sat, 23 Apr 2022 20:48:29 -0700
From:   Roopa Prabhu <roopa@...dia.com>
To:     Jaehee Park <jhpark1013@...il.com>, outreachy@...ts.linux.dev,
        Julia Denham <jdenham@...hat.com>,
        Roopa Prabhu <roopa.prabhu@...il.com>,
        Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@...hat.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2] selftests: net: vrf_strict_mode_test: add
 support to select a test to run


On 4/21/22 09:40, Jaehee Park wrote:
> Add a boilerplate test loop to run all tests in
> vrf_strict_mode_test.sh. Add a -t flag that allows a selected test to
> run.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jaehee Park <jhpark1013@...il.com>
> ---

Thanks Jaehee.

CC, David Ahern

David, this might be an overkill for this test. But nonetheless a step 
towards bringing some uniformity in the tests.

next step is to ideally move this to a library to remove repeating this 
boilerplate loop in every test.


.../selftests/net/vrf_strict_mode_test.sh | 31 ++++++++++++++++++-

>   1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/net/vrf_strict_mode_test.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/net/vrf_strict_mode_test.sh
> index 865d53c1781c..ca4379265706 100755
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/net/vrf_strict_mode_test.sh
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/vrf_strict_mode_test.sh
> @@ -14,6 +14,8 @@ INIT_NETNS_NAME="init"
>   
>   PAUSE_ON_FAIL=${PAUSE_ON_FAIL:=no}
>   
> +TESTS="init testns mix"
> +
>   log_test()
>   {
>   	local rc=$1
> @@ -353,6 +355,23 @@ vrf_strict_mode_tests()
>   	vrf_strict_mode_tests_mix
>   }
>   
> +usage()
> +{
> +	cat <<EOF
> +usage: ${0##*/} OPTS
> +
> +	-t <test> Test(s) to run (default: all)
> +		  (options: $TESTS)
> +EOF
> +}
> +while getopts ":t:h" opt; do
> +	case $opt in
> +		t) TESTS=$OPTARG;;
> +		h) usage; exit 0;;
> +		*) usage; exit 1;;
> +	esac
> +done
> +
>   vrf_strict_mode_check_support()
>   {
>   	local nsname=$1
> @@ -391,7 +410,17 @@ fi
>   cleanup &> /dev/null
>   
>   setup
> -vrf_strict_mode_tests
> +for t in $TESTS
> +do
> +	case $t in
> +	vrf_strict_mode_tests_init|init) vrf_strict_mode_tests_init;;
> +	vrf_strict_mode_tests_testns|testns) vrf_strict_mode_tests_testns;;
> +	vrf_strict_mode_tests_mix|mix) vrf_strict_mode_tests_mix;;
> +
> +	help) echo "Test names: $TESTS"; exit 0;;
> +
> +	esac
> +done
>   cleanup
>   
>   print_log_test_results