[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0f1e1250-920a-c7d1-900c-98ef3e0456d8@blackwall.org>
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2022 00:52:39 +0300
From: Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@...ckwall.org>
To: Alaa Mohamed <eng.alaamohamedsoliman.am@...il.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: outreachy@...ts.linux.dev, roopa@...dia.com, jdenham@...hat.com,
sbrivio@...hat.com, jesse.brandeburg@...el.com,
anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com, davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org,
pabeni@...hat.com, vladimir.oltean@....com, claudiu.manoil@....com,
alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com, shshaikh@...vell.com,
manishc@...vell.com, intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com,
GR-Linux-NIC-Dev@...vell.com, bridge@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 1/2] rtnetlink: add extack support in fdb del
handlers
On 4/25/22 00:09, Alaa Mohamed wrote:
>
> On ٢٤/٤/٢٠٢٢ ٢١:٥٥, Nikolay Aleksandrov wrote:
>> On 24/04/2022 22:49, Alaa Mohamed wrote:
>>> On ٢٤/٤/٢٠٢٢ ٢١:٠٢, Nikolay Aleksandrov wrote:
>>>> On 24/04/2022 15:09, Alaa Mohamed wrote:
>>>>> Add extack support to .ndo_fdb_del in netdevice.h and
>>>>> all related methods.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Alaa Mohamed <eng.alaamohamedsoliman.am@...il.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> changes in V3:
>>>>> fix errors reported by checkpatch.pl
>>>>> ---
>>>>> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_main.c | 4 ++--
>>>>> drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot_net.c | 4 ++--
>>>>> drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qlcnic/qlcnic_main.c | 2 +-
>>>>> drivers/net/macvlan.c | 2 +-
>>>>> drivers/net/vxlan/vxlan_core.c | 2 +-
>>>>> include/linux/netdevice.h | 2 +-
>>>>> net/bridge/br_fdb.c | 2 +-
>>>>> net/bridge/br_private.h | 2 +-
>>>>> net/core/rtnetlink.c | 4 ++--
>>>>> 9 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_main.c
>>>>> b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_main.c
>>>>> index d768925785ca..7b55d8d94803 100644
>>>>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_main.c
>>>>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_main.c
>>>>> @@ -5678,10 +5678,10 @@ ice_fdb_add(struct ndmsg *ndm, struct
>>>>> nlattr __always_unused *tb[],
>>>>> static int
>>>>> ice_fdb_del(struct ndmsg *ndm, __always_unused struct nlattr *tb[],
>>>>> struct net_device *dev, const unsigned char *addr,
>>>>> - __always_unused u16 vid)
>>>>> + __always_unused u16 vid, struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
>>>>> {
>>>>> int err;
>>>>> -
>>>>> +
>>>> What's changed here?
>>> In the previous version, I removed the blank line after "int err;"
>>> and you said I shouldn't so I added blank line.
>>>
>> Yeah, my question is are you fixing a dos ending or something else?
>> The blank line is already there, what's wrong with it?
> No, I didn't.
>>
>> The point is it's not nice to mix style fixes and other changes, more so
>> if nothing is mentioned in the commit message.
> Got it, So, what should I do to fix it?
Don't change that line? I mean I'm even surprised this made it in the
patch. As I mentioned above, there is already a new line there so I'm
not sure how you're removing it and adding it again. :)
Cheers,
Nik
Powered by blists - more mailing lists