[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220425080057.0fc4ef66@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2022 08:00:57 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>
Cc: Lukas Wunner <lukas@...ner.de>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Oliver Neukum <oneukum@...e.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Jacky Chou <jackychou@...x.com.tw>, Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>,
Lino Sanfilippo <LinoSanfilippo@....de>,
Philipp Rosenberger <p.rosenberger@...bus.com>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: linkwatch: ignore events for unregistered netdevs
On Mon, 25 Apr 2022 16:49:34 +0200 Jann Horn wrote:
> > Doesn't mean we should make it legal. We can add a warning to catch
> > abuses.
>
> That was the idea with
> https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20220128014303.2334568-1-jannh@google.com/,
> but I didn't get any replies when I asked what the precise semantics
> of dev_hold() are supposed to be
> (https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/CAG48ez1-OyZETvrYAfaHicYW1LbrQUVp=C0EukSWqZrYMej73w@mail.gmail.com/),
> so I don't know how to proceed...
Yeah, I think after you pointed out that the netdev per cpu refcounting
is fundamentally broken everybody decided to hit themselves with the
obliviate spell :S
Powered by blists - more mailing lists