[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d4558414-f58f-2a51-5957-9e9454f3cad4@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2022 13:03:59 -0700
From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
To: Jonathan Lemon <jonathan.lemon@...il.com>, opendmb@...il.com,
f.fainelli@...il.com, bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...com, kuba@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next RESEND] net: bcmgenet: hide status block before
TX timestamping
On 4/24/22 09:53, Jonathan Lemon wrote:
> The hardware checksum offloading requires use of a transmit
> status block inserted before the outgoing frame data, this was
> updated in '9a9ba2a4aaaa ("net: bcmgenet: always enable status blocks")'
>
> However, skb_tx_timestamp() assumes that it is passed a raw frame
> and PTP parsing chokes on this status block.
>
> Fix this by calling __skb_pull(), which hides the TSB before calling
> skb_tx_timestamp(), so an outgoing PTP packet is parsed correctly.
>
> As the data in the skb has already been set up for DMA, and the
> dma_unmap_* calls use a separately stored address, there is no
> no effective change in the data transmission.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Lemon <jonathan.lemon@...il.com>
Without restructuring the way we do time-stamping within the driver to
be before bcmgenet_insert_tsb() this appears to get you what you want
without being too intrusive. I would slap a:
Fixes: d03825fba459 ("net: bcmgenet: add skb_tx_timestamp call")
since this is a bug fix that should be fixed back when this was added.
It was only made recently problematic by default with the enabling of
the transmit checksum offload which implicit forces the use of a 64 byte
transmit status block.
With that said:
Acked-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
Now, if we wanted to avoid playing tricks with the sk_buff, we could
place skb_tx_timestamp() earlier in the transmit path with the risk that
we are no longer as close as possible from hitting the DMA, and subject
to DMA mapping or allocation failures. Food for thought.
Thanks!
--
Florian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists