netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v1 0/4] Broadcom PTP PHY support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sun, 24 Apr 2022 18:01:33 -0700
From:   Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
To:     Jonathan Lemon <jonathan.lemon@...il.com>
Cc:     f.fainelli@...il.com, bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com,
        andrew@...n.ch, hkallweit1@...il.com, linux@...linux.org.uk,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v1 0/4] Broadcom PTP PHY support

On Sat, Apr 23, 2022 at 07:23:52PM -0700, Jonathan Lemon wrote:

> There are other Broadcom chips which may benefit from using the 
> same framework here, although with different register sets.

Based on two examples, the present 542xx and the 541xx (which I am
familiar with), it appears that the registers sets are the same in
gen1, just the base offset is different.

So it would be great to store the base in bcm_ptp_private, adding the
base into each read/write operation.

Thanks,
Richard