netdev - Re: [PATCH v3] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Fix port_hidden_wait to account for port_base

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 26 Apr 2022 10:30:11 +0000
From:   patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@...nel.org
To:     Nathan Rossi <nathan@...hanrossi.com>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        andrew@...n.ch, vivien.didelot@...il.com, f.fainelli@...il.com,
        olteanv@...il.com, davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org,
        pabeni@...hat.com, kabel@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Fix port_hidden_wait to account for
 port_base_addr

Hello:

This patch was applied to netdev/net.git (master)
by Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>:

On Mon, 25 Apr 2022 07:04:54 +0000 you wrote:
> The other port_hidden functions rely on the port_read/port_write
> functions to access the hidden control port. These functions apply the
> offset for port_base_addr where applicable. Update port_hidden_wait to
> use the port_wait_bit so that port_base_addr offsets are accounted for
> when waiting for the busy bit to change.
> 
> Without the offset the port_hidden_wait function would timeout on
> devices that have a non-zero port_base_addr (e.g. MV88E6141), however
> devices that have a zero port_base_addr would operate correctly (e.g.
> MV88E6390).
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [v3] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Fix port_hidden_wait to account for port_base_addr
    https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net/c/24cbdb910bb6

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html