netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 00/11] mlxsw: extend line card model by devices and info

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YmfnagAJXolPjAi/@nanopsycho>
Date:   Tue, 26 Apr 2022 14:36:59 +0200
From:   Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
To:     Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Ido Schimmel <idosch@...sch.org>,
        Ido Schimmel <idosch@...dia.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        davem@...emloft.net, pabeni@...hat.com, jiri@...dia.com,
        petrm@...dia.com, dsahern@...il.com, mlxsw@...dia.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 00/11] mlxsw: extend line card model by devices
 and info

Tue, Apr 26, 2022 at 02:11:43PM CEST, andrew@...n.ch wrote:
>> >> The idea (implemented in the next patchset) is to let these devices
>> >> expose their own "component name", which can then be plugged into the
>> >> existing flash command:
>> >> 
>> >>     $ devlink lc show pci/0000:01:00.0 lc 8
>> >>     pci/0000:01:00.0:
>> >>       lc 8 state active type 16x100G
>> >>         supported_types:
>> >>            16x100G
>> >>         devices:
>> >>           device 0 flashable true component lc8_dev0
>> >>           device 1 flashable false
>> >>           device 2 flashable false
>> >>           device 3 flashable false
>> >>     $ devlink dev flash pci/0000:01:00.0 file some_file.mfa2 component lc8_dev0
>> >
>> >IDK if it's just me or this assumes deep knowledge of the system.
>> >I don't understand why we need to list devices 1-3 at all. And they
>> >don't even have names. No information is exposed. 
>> 
>> There are 4 gearboxes on the line card. They share the same flash. So if
>> you flash gearbox 0, the rest will use the same FW.
>
>Is the flash big enough to hold four copies of the firmware? Listing

One copy, all 4 are using it.


>all four devices gives you a path forward to allowing each device to
>have its own firmware.

Yes.

>
>On the flip side, flashable false is not really true. I don't know
>this API at all, but are there any flags? Can you at least indicate it
>is shared? You could then have an output something like:

Yes, that I can do.

>
>           device 0 flashable true shared component lc8_dev0
>           device 1 flashable true shared component lc8_dev0
>           device 2 flashable true shared component lc8_dev0
>           device 3 flashable true shared component lc8_dev0
>
>so you get to see the sharing relationship.

Agreed.

>
>   Andrew