netdev - [PATCH net-next 3/7] mptcp: add data lock for sk timers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20220426215717.129506-4-mathew.j.martineau@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Tue, 26 Apr 2022 14:57:13 -0700
From:   Mat Martineau <mathew.j.martineau@...ux.intel.com>
To:     netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Geliang Tang <geliang.tang@...e.com>, davem@...emloft.net,
        kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, matthieu.baerts@...sares.net,
        mptcp@...ts.linux.dev,
        Mat Martineau <mathew.j.martineau@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 3/7] mptcp: add data lock for sk timers

From: Geliang Tang <geliang.tang@...e.com>

mptcp_data_lock() needs to be held when manipulating the msk
retransmit_timer or the sk sk_timer. This patch adds the data
lock for the both timers.

Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang <geliang.tang@...e.com>
Signed-off-by: Mat Martineau <mathew.j.martineau@...ux.intel.com>
---
 net/mptcp/protocol.c | 12 ++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)

diff --git a/net/mptcp/protocol.c b/net/mptcp/protocol.c
index e3db319ce92e..ea74122065f1 100644
--- a/net/mptcp/protocol.c
+++ b/net/mptcp/protocol.c
@@ -1605,8 +1605,10 @@ void __mptcp_push_pending(struct sock *sk, unsigned int flags)
 
 out:
 	/* ensure the rtx timer is running */
+	mptcp_data_lock(sk);
 	if (!mptcp_timer_pending(sk))
 		mptcp_reset_timer(sk);
+	mptcp_data_unlock(sk);
 	if (copied)
 		__mptcp_check_send_data_fin(sk);
 }
@@ -2491,8 +2493,10 @@ static void __mptcp_retrans(struct sock *sk)
 reset_timer:
 	mptcp_check_and_set_pending(sk);
 
+	mptcp_data_lock(sk);
 	if (!mptcp_timer_pending(sk))
 		mptcp_reset_timer(sk);
+	mptcp_data_unlock(sk);
 }
 
 static void mptcp_worker(struct work_struct *work)
@@ -2651,8 +2655,10 @@ void mptcp_subflow_shutdown(struct sock *sk, struct sock *ssk, int how)
 		} else {
 			pr_debug("Sending DATA_FIN on subflow %p", ssk);
 			tcp_send_ack(ssk);
+			mptcp_data_lock(sk);
 			if (!mptcp_timer_pending(sk))
 				mptcp_reset_timer(sk);
+			mptcp_data_unlock(sk);
 		}
 		break;
 	}
@@ -2753,8 +2759,10 @@ static void __mptcp_destroy_sock(struct sock *sk)
 	/* join list will be eventually flushed (with rst) at sock lock release time*/
 	list_splice_init(&msk->conn_list, &conn_list);
 
+	mptcp_data_lock(sk);
 	mptcp_stop_timer(sk);
 	sk_stop_timer(sk, &sk->sk_timer);
+	mptcp_data_unlock(sk);
 	msk->pm.status = 0;
 
 	/* clears msk->subflow, allowing the following loop to close
@@ -2816,7 +2824,9 @@ static void mptcp_close(struct sock *sk, long timeout)
 		__mptcp_destroy_sock(sk);
 		do_cancel_work = true;
 	} else {
+		mptcp_data_lock(sk);
 		sk_reset_timer(sk, &sk->sk_timer, jiffies + TCP_TIMEWAIT_LEN);
+		mptcp_data_unlock(sk);
 	}
 	release_sock(sk);
 	if (do_cancel_work)
@@ -2861,8 +2871,10 @@ static int mptcp_disconnect(struct sock *sk, int flags)
 		__mptcp_close_ssk(sk, ssk, subflow, MPTCP_CF_FASTCLOSE);
 	}
 
+	mptcp_data_lock(sk);
 	mptcp_stop_timer(sk);
 	sk_stop_timer(sk, &sk->sk_timer);
+	mptcp_data_unlock(sk);
 
 	if (mptcp_sk(sk)->token)
 		mptcp_event(MPTCP_EVENT_CLOSED, mptcp_sk(sk), NULL, GFP_KERNEL);
-- 
2.36.0