netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 5/7] usbnet: smsc95xx: Forward PHY interrupts to PHY driver to avoid polling

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 27 Apr 2022 14:26:18 +0200
From:   Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To:     Lukas Wunner <lukas@...ner.de>
Cc:     Steve Glendinning <steve.glendinning@...well.net>,
        UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com, Oliver Neukum <oneukum@...e.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, Andre Edich <andre.edich@...rochip.com>,
        Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>,
        Martyn Welch <martyn.welch@...labora.com>,
        Gabriel Hojda <ghojda@...urs.ro>,
        Christoph Fritz <chf.fritz@...glemail.com>,
        Lino Sanfilippo <LinoSanfilippo@....de>,
        Philipp Rosenberger <p.rosenberger@...bus.com>,
        Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 5/7] usbnet: smsc95xx: Forward PHY interrupts to
 PHY driver to avoid polling

On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 07:48:05AM +0200, Lukas Wunner wrote:
> Link status of SMSC LAN95xx chips is polled once per second, even though
> they're capable of signaling PHY interrupts through the MAC layer.
> 
> Forward those interrupts to the PHY driver to avoid polling.  Benefits
> are reduced bus traffic, reduced CPU overhead and quicker interface
> bringup.
> 
> Polling was introduced in 2016 by commit d69d16949346 ("usbnet:
> smsc95xx: fix link detection for disabled autonegotiation").
> Back then, the LAN95xx driver neglected to enable the ENERGYON interrupt,
> hence couldn't detect link-up events when auto-negotiation was disabled.
> The proper solution would have been to enable the ENERGYON interrupt
> instead of polling.
> 
> Since then, PHY handling was moved from the LAN95xx driver to the SMSC
> PHY driver with commit 05b35e7eb9a1 ("smsc95xx: add phylib support").
> That PHY driver is capable of link detection with auto-negotiation
> disabled because it enables the ENERGYON interrupt.
> 
> Note that signaling interrupts through the MAC layer not only works with
> the integrated PHY, but also with an external PHY, provided its
> interrupt pin is attached to LAN95xx's nPHY_INT pin.
> 
> In the unlikely event that the interrupt pin of an external PHY is
> attached to a GPIO of the SoC (or not connected at all), the driver can
> be amended to retrieve the irq from the PHY's of_node.
> 
> To forward PHY interrupts to phylib, it is not sufficient to call
> phy_mac_interrupt().  Instead, the PHY's interrupt handler needs to run
> so that PHY interrupts are cleared.  That's because according to page
> 119 of the LAN950x datasheet, "The source of this interrupt is a level.
> The interrupt persists until it is cleared in the PHY."
> 
> https://www.microchip.com/content/dam/mchp/documents/UNG/ProductDocuments/DataSheets/LAN950x-Data-Sheet-DS00001875D.pdf
> 
> Therefore, create an IRQ domain with a single IRQ for the PHY.  In the
> future, the IRQ domain may be extended to support the 11 GPIOs on the
> LAN95xx.
> 
> Normally the PHY interrupt should be masked until the PHY driver has
> cleared it.  However masking requires a (sleeping) USB transaction and
> interrupts are received in (non-sleepable) softirq context.  I decided
> not to mask the interrupt at all (by using the dummy_irq_chip's noop
> ->irq_mask() callback):  The USB interrupt endpoint is polled in 1 msec
> intervals and normally that's sufficient to wake the PHY driver's IRQ
> thread and have it clear the interrupt.  If it does take longer, worst
> thing that can happen is the IRQ thread is woken again.  No big deal.
> 
> Because PHY interrupts are now perpetually enabled, there's no need to
> selectively enable them on suspend.  So remove all invocations of
> smsc95xx_enable_phy_wakeup_interrupts().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Lukas Wunner <lukas@...ner.de>
> Cc: Andre Edich <andre.edich@...rochip.com>

This looks reasonable from a PHY perspective. I cannot say much about
USB though.

Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>

    Andrew