[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHNKnsTh0A85XTy8+Gk-3dCFee9ynB3+r0S3HcwJ8DkM5e4ADg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2022 16:17:45 +0300
From: Sergey Ryazanov <ryazanov.s.a@...il.com>
To: Loic Poulain <loic.poulain@...aro.org>
Cc: Ricardo Martinez <ricardo.martinez@...ux.intel.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>,
M Chetan Kumar <m.chetan.kumar@...el.com>,
"Devegowda, Chandrashekar" <chandrashekar.devegowda@...el.com>,
Intel Corporation <linuxwwan@...el.com>,
chiranjeevi.rapolu@...ux.intel.com,
Haijun Liu (刘海军)
<haijun.liu@...iatek.com>,
"Hanania, Amir" <amir.hanania@...el.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
"Sharma, Dinesh" <dinesh.sharma@...el.com>,
"Lee, Eliot" <eliot.lee@...el.com>,
"Jarvinen, Ilpo Johannes" <ilpo.johannes.jarvinen@...el.com>,
"Veleta, Moises" <moises.veleta@...el.com>,
"Bossart, Pierre-louis" <pierre-louis.bossart@...el.com>,
"Sethuraman, Muralidharan" <muralidharan.sethuraman@...el.com>,
"Mishra, Soumya Prakash" <Soumya.Prakash.Mishra@...el.com>,
"Kancharla, Sreehari" <sreehari.kancharla@...el.com>,
"Sahu, Madhusmita" <madhusmita.sahu@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v6 02/13] net: wwan: t7xx: Add control DMA interface
On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 3:35 PM Loic Poulain <loic.poulain@...aro.org> wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Apr 2022 at 02:19, Sergey Ryazanov <ryazanov.s.a@...il.com> wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 8, 2022 at 1:37 AM Ricardo Martinez
>> <ricardo.martinez@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>>> ...
>>> Co-developed-by: Ricardo Martinez <ricardo.martinez@...ux.intel.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Ricardo Martinez <ricardo.martinez@...ux.intel.com>
>>>
>>> From a WWAN framework perspective:
>>> Reviewed-by: Loic Poulain <loic.poulain@...aro.org>
>>>
>>> Reviewed-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>
>>
>> This line with "From a WWAN framework perspective" looks confusing to
>> me. Anyone not familiar with all of the iterations will be in doubt as
>> to whether it belongs only to Loic's review or to both of them.
>>
>> How about to format this block like this:
>>
>>> Co-developed-by: Ricardo Martinez <ricardo.martinez@...ux.intel.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Ricardo Martinez <ricardo.martinez@...ux.intel.com>
>>> Reviewed-by: Loic Poulain <loic.poulain@...aro.org> (WWAN framework)
>>> Reviewed-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>
>>
>> or like this:
>>
>>> Co-developed-by: Ricardo Martinez <ricardo.martinez@...ux.intel.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Ricardo Martinez <ricardo.martinez@...ux.intel.com>
>>> Reviewed-by: Loic Poulain <loic.poulain@...aro.org> # WWAN framework
>>> Reviewed-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>
>>
>> Parentheses vs. comment sign. I saw people use both of these formats,
>> I just do not know which is better. What do you think?
>
> My initial comment was to highlight that someone else should double
> check the network code, but it wasn't expected to end up in the commit
> message. Maybe simply drop this extra comment?
Yep, this drastically solves the problem with comment format :) I do not mind.
--
Sergey
Powered by blists - more mailing lists