netdev - [PATCH net-next 2/7] usbnet: smsc95xx: Don't clear read-only PHY interrupt

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <91a3499156cff9123ede28c95e802d47f4151141.1651037513.git.lukas@wunner.de>
Date:   Wed, 27 Apr 2022 07:48:02 +0200
From:   Lukas Wunner <lukas@...ner.de>
To:     Steve Glendinning <steve.glendinning@...well.net>,
        UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com, Oliver Neukum <oneukum@...e.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
        Andre Edich <andre.edich@...rochip.com>,
        Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>,
        Martyn Welch <martyn.welch@...labora.com>,
        Gabriel Hojda <ghojda@...urs.ro>,
        Christoph Fritz <chf.fritz@...glemail.com>,
        Lino Sanfilippo <LinoSanfilippo@....de>,
        Philipp Rosenberger <p.rosenberger@...bus.com>,
        Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 2/7] usbnet: smsc95xx: Don't clear read-only PHY
 interrupt

Upon receiving data from the Interrupt Endpoint, the SMSC LAN95xx driver
attempts to clear the signaled interrupts by writing "all ones" to the
Interrupt Status Register.

However the driver only ever enables a single type of interrupt, namely
the PHY Interrupt.  And according to page 119 of the LAN950x datasheet,
its bit in the Interrupt Status Register is read-only.  There's no other
way to clear it than in a separate PHY register:

https://www.microchip.com/content/dam/mchp/documents/UNG/ProductDocuments/DataSheets/LAN950x-Data-Sheet-DS00001875D.pdf

Consequently, writing "all ones" to the Interrupt Status Register is
pointless and can be dropped.

Signed-off-by: Lukas Wunner <lukas@...ner.de>
---
 drivers/net/usb/smsc95xx.c | 4 ----
 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/usb/smsc95xx.c b/drivers/net/usb/smsc95xx.c
index edf0492ad489..2cb44d65bbc3 100644
--- a/drivers/net/usb/smsc95xx.c
+++ b/drivers/net/usb/smsc95xx.c
@@ -572,10 +572,6 @@ static int smsc95xx_link_reset(struct usbnet *dev)
 	unsigned long flags;
 	int ret;
 
-	ret = smsc95xx_write_reg(dev, INT_STS, INT_STS_CLEAR_ALL_);
-	if (ret < 0)
-		return ret;
-
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&pdata->mac_cr_lock, flags);
 	if (pdata->phydev->duplex != DUPLEX_FULL) {
 		pdata->mac_cr &= ~MAC_CR_FDPX_;
-- 
2.35.2