netdev - Re: [PATCH] Revert "mt76: mt7921: enable aspm by default"

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <60d2a5b8-7e25-3020-6092-64afe7abc186@leemhuis.info>
Date:   Wed, 27 Apr 2022 09:32:05 +0200
From:   Thorsten Leemhuis <regressions@...mhuis.info>
To:     Kalle Valo <kvalo@...nel.org>
Cc:     Philippe Schenker <dev@...henker.ch>,
        linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, Felix Fietkau <nbd@....name>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Deren Wu <deren.wu@...iatek.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo.bianconi83@...il.com>,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        Ryder Lee <ryder.lee@...iatek.com>,
        Sean Wang <sean.wang@...iatek.com>,
        Shayne Chen <shayne.chen@...iatek.com>,
        YN Chen <YN.Chen@...iatek.com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        "regressions@...ts.linux.dev" <regressions@...ts.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "mt76: mt7921: enable aspm by default"

On 12.04.22 12:36, Kalle Valo wrote:
>> Ciao, Thorsten (wearing his 'the Linux kernel's regression tracker' hat)
>> [...]
>> P.S.: As the Linux kernel's regression tracker I'm getting a lot of
>> reports on my table. I can only look briefly into most of them and lack
>> knowledge about most of the areas they concern. I thus unfortunately
>> will sometimes get things wrong or miss something important. I hope
>> that's not the case here; if you think it is, don't hesitate to tell me
>> in a public reply, it's in everyone's interest to set the public record
>> straight.
> BTW, maybe you could add that boilerplace text after P.S. into the
> signature (ie. under "-- " line)? That way your mails would more
> readable and make it more clear that you didn't write the boilerplate
> text specifically for this mail.

Late reply:

FYI, I thought back and forth about the boilerplace text and how to
handle that when I started using it. I deliberately decided against
putting it under a "-- " line, as that wouldn't work well for some of
the mails I write -- for example those where I deliberately use
top-posting (which I hate and kinda feels wrong, but nevertheless right
at the same time) to make this as easy to grasp as possible.

After your comment I have thought about it again for a while but in the
end for now decided to mostly stick to the approach I used, but your
comment made me shorten the text a bit.

Ciao, Thorsten