netdev - Re: pull-request: bpf-next 2022-04-27

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 27 Apr 2022 17:05:26 -0700
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To:     Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
Cc:     patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@...nel.org, davem@...emloft.net,
        pabeni@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com, ast@...nel.org,
        andrii@...nel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: pull-request: bpf-next 2022-04-27

On Wed, 27 Apr 2022 23:01:46 +0000 patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@...nel.org
wrote:
> Hello:
> 
> This pull request was applied to bpf/bpf.git (master)
> by Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>:

Boty McBotface still confusing bpf and bpf-next PRs :(

Pulling now.

No chance we can silence the "should be static" warnings?

The new unpriv_ebpf_notify() in particular seems like it could
use a header declaration - if someone is supposed to override it 
they better match the prototype?