[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ec08a059-2a04-3e9c-cbad-a5af2d2744e0@openvz.org>
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2022 07:37:00 +0300
From: Vasily Averin <vvs@...nvz.org>
To: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev>
Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>,
Michal Koutný <mkoutny@...e.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>, kernel@...nvz.org,
Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
Cgroups <cgroups@...r.kernel.org>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH memcg v4] net: set proper memcg for net_init hooks
allocations
On 4/28/22 01:36, Roman Gushchin wrote:
> We can point root_mem_cgroup at a statically allocated structure
> on both CONFIG_MEMCG and !CONFIG_MEMCG.
> Does it sound reasonable or I'm missing some important points?
I expect Embedded developers will be highly disagree.
Pointer only should be acceptable for them.
Thank you,
Vasily Averin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists