[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YmovcRTm1l6pv93/@shredder>
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2022 09:08:49 +0300
From: Ido Schimmel <idosch@...sch.org>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc: "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Ido Schimmel <idosch@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: make sure net_rx_action() calls
skb_defer_free_flush()
On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 01:41:47PM -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
>
> I missed a stray return; in net_rx_action(), which very well
> is taken whenever trigger_rx_softirq() has been called on
> a cpu that is no longer receiving network packets,
> or receiving too few of them.
>
> Fixes: 68822bdf76f1 ("net: generalize skb freeing deferral to per-cpu lists")
> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
> Reported-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@...dia.com>
Tested-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@...dia.com>
Thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists