lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220429211540.715151-11-sdf@google.com>
Date:   Fri, 29 Apr 2022 14:15:40 -0700
From:   Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>
To:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net, andrii@...nel.org,
        Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v6 10/10] selftests/bpf: verify lsm_cgroup struct
 sock access

sk_priority & sk_mark are writable, the rest is readonly.

Add new ldx_offset fixups to lookup the offset of struct field.
Allow using test.kfunc regardless of prog_type.

One interesting thing here is that the verifier doesn't
really force me to add NULL checks anywhere :-/

Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c   | 54 ++++++++++++++++++-
 .../selftests/bpf/verifier/lsm_cgroup.c       | 34 ++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 87 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/lsm_cgroup.c

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
index 372579c9f45e..49961492cbd4 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
@@ -75,6 +75,12 @@ struct kfunc_btf_id_pair {
 	int insn_idx;
 };
 
+struct ldx_offset {
+	const char *strct;
+	const char *field;
+	int insn_idx;
+};
+
 struct bpf_test {
 	const char *descr;
 	struct bpf_insn	insns[MAX_INSNS];
@@ -103,6 +109,7 @@ struct bpf_test {
 	int fixup_map_timer[MAX_FIXUPS];
 	int fixup_map_kptr[MAX_FIXUPS];
 	struct kfunc_btf_id_pair fixup_kfunc_btf_id[MAX_FIXUPS];
+	struct ldx_offset fixup_ldx[MAX_FIXUPS];
 	/* Expected verifier log output for result REJECT or VERBOSE_ACCEPT.
 	 * Can be a tab-separated sequence of expected strings. An empty string
 	 * means no log verification.
@@ -799,6 +806,7 @@ static void do_test_fixup(struct bpf_test *test, enum bpf_prog_type prog_type,
 	int *fixup_map_timer = test->fixup_map_timer;
 	int *fixup_map_kptr = test->fixup_map_kptr;
 	struct kfunc_btf_id_pair *fixup_kfunc_btf_id = test->fixup_kfunc_btf_id;
+	struct ldx_offset *fixup_ldx = test->fixup_ldx;
 
 	if (test->fill_helper) {
 		test->fill_insns = calloc(MAX_TEST_INSNS, sizeof(struct bpf_insn));
@@ -1018,6 +1026,50 @@ static void do_test_fixup(struct bpf_test *test, enum bpf_prog_type prog_type,
 			fixup_kfunc_btf_id++;
 		} while (fixup_kfunc_btf_id->kfunc);
 	}
+
+	if (fixup_ldx->strct) {
+		const struct btf_member *memb;
+		const struct btf_type *tp;
+		const char *name;
+		struct btf *btf;
+		int btf_id;
+		int off;
+		int i;
+
+		btf = btf__load_vmlinux_btf();
+
+		do {
+			off = -1;
+			if (!btf)
+				goto next_ldx;
+
+			btf_id = btf__find_by_name_kind(btf,
+							fixup_ldx->strct,
+							BTF_KIND_STRUCT);
+			if (btf_id < 0)
+				goto next_ldx;
+
+			tp = btf__type_by_id(btf, btf_id);
+			memb = btf_members(tp);
+
+			for (i = 0; i < btf_vlen(tp); i++) {
+				name = btf__name_by_offset(btf,
+							   memb->name_off);
+				if (strcmp(fixup_ldx->field, name) == 0) {
+					off = memb->offset / 8;
+					break;
+				}
+				memb++;
+			}
+
+next_ldx:
+			prog[fixup_ldx->insn_idx].off = off;
+			fixup_ldx++;
+
+		} while (fixup_ldx->strct);
+
+		btf__free(btf);
+	}
 }
 
 struct libcap {
@@ -1182,7 +1234,7 @@ static void do_test_single(struct bpf_test *test, bool unpriv,
 		opts.log_level = 4;
 	opts.prog_flags = pflags;
 
-	if (prog_type == BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACING && test->kfunc) {
+	if (test->kfunc) {
 		int attach_btf_id;
 
 		attach_btf_id = libbpf_find_vmlinux_btf_id(test->kfunc,
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/lsm_cgroup.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/lsm_cgroup.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..af0efe783511
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/lsm_cgroup.c
@@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
+#define SK_WRITABLE_FIELD(tp, field, size, res) \
+{ \
+	.descr = field, \
+	.insns = { \
+		/* r1 = *(u64 *)(r1 + 0) */ \
+		BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_1, 0), \
+		/* r1 = *(u64 *)(r1 + offsetof(struct socket, sk)) */ \
+		BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_1, 0), \
+		/* r2 = *(u64 *)(r1 + offsetof(struct sock, <field>)) */ \
+		BPF_LDX_MEM(size, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1, 0), \
+		/* *(u64 *)(r1 + offsetof(struct sock, <field>)) = r2 */ \
+		BPF_STX_MEM(size, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_2, 0), \
+		BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 1), \
+		BPF_EXIT_INSN(), \
+	}, \
+	.result = res, \
+	.errstr = res ? "no write support to 'struct sock' at off" : "", \
+	.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_LSM, \
+	.expected_attach_type = BPF_LSM_CGROUP, \
+	.kfunc = "socket_post_create", \
+	.fixup_ldx = { \
+		{ "socket", "sk", 1 }, \
+		{ tp, field, 2 }, \
+		{ tp, field, 3 }, \
+	}, \
+}
+
+SK_WRITABLE_FIELD("sock_common", "skc_family", BPF_H, REJECT),
+SK_WRITABLE_FIELD("sock", "sk_sndtimeo", BPF_DW, REJECT),
+SK_WRITABLE_FIELD("sock", "sk_priority", BPF_W, ACCEPT),
+SK_WRITABLE_FIELD("sock", "sk_mark", BPF_W, ACCEPT),
+SK_WRITABLE_FIELD("sock", "sk_pacing_rate", BPF_DW, REJECT),
+
+#undef SK_WRITABLE_FIELD
-- 
2.36.0.464.gb9c8b46e94-goog

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ