lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANn89i+fXaDBptNMYjUqKhAuZrRX7+0v7sv5DZqK4seLCzBO3A@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 2 May 2022 17:02:07 -0700
From:   Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
To:     Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
Cc:     netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
        Cong Wang <cong.wang@...edance.com>,
        John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@...udflare.com>
Subject: Re: [Patch bpf-next v2 1/4] tcp: introduce tcp_read_skb()

On Mon, May 2, 2022 at 11:24 AM Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com> wrote:
>
> From: Cong Wang <cong.wang@...edance.com>
>
> This patch inroduces tcp_read_skb() based on tcp_read_sock(),
> a preparation for the next patch which actually introduces
> a new sock ops.
>
> TCP is special here, because it has tcp_read_sock() which is
> mainly used by splice(). tcp_read_sock() supports partial read
> and arbitrary offset, neither of them is needed for sockmap.
>
> Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
> Cc: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>
> Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
> Cc: Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@...udflare.com>
> Signed-off-by: Cong Wang <cong.wang@...edance.com>
> ---
>  include/net/tcp.h |  2 ++
>  net/ipv4/tcp.c    | 63 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
>  2 files changed, 57 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/net/tcp.h b/include/net/tcp.h
> index 94a52ad1101c..ab7516e5cc56 100644
> --- a/include/net/tcp.h
> +++ b/include/net/tcp.h
> @@ -667,6 +667,8 @@ void tcp_get_info(struct sock *, struct tcp_info *);
>  /* Read 'sendfile()'-style from a TCP socket */
>  int tcp_read_sock(struct sock *sk, read_descriptor_t *desc,
>                   sk_read_actor_t recv_actor);
> +int tcp_read_skb(struct sock *sk, read_descriptor_t *desc,
> +                sk_read_actor_t recv_actor);
>
>  void tcp_initialize_rcv_mss(struct sock *sk);
>
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp.c b/net/ipv4/tcp.c
> index db55af9eb37b..8d48126e3694 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/tcp.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/tcp.c
> @@ -1600,7 +1600,7 @@ static void tcp_eat_recv_skb(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
>         __kfree_skb(skb);
>  }
>
> -static struct sk_buff *tcp_recv_skb(struct sock *sk, u32 seq, u32 *off)
> +static struct sk_buff *tcp_recv_skb(struct sock *sk, u32 seq, u32 *off, bool unlink)
>  {
>         struct sk_buff *skb;
>         u32 offset;
> @@ -1613,6 +1613,8 @@ static struct sk_buff *tcp_recv_skb(struct sock *sk, u32 seq, u32 *off)
>                 }
>                 if (offset < skb->len || (TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->tcp_flags & TCPHDR_FIN)) {
>                         *off = offset;
> +                       if (unlink)
> +                               __skb_unlink(skb, &sk->sk_receive_queue);

Why adding this @unlink parameter ?
This makes your patch more invasive than needed.
Can not this unlink happen from your new helper instead ? See [3] later.

>                         return skb;
>                 }
>                 /* This looks weird, but this can happen if TCP collapsing
> @@ -1646,7 +1648,7 @@ int tcp_read_sock(struct sock *sk, read_descriptor_t *desc,
>
>         if (sk->sk_state == TCP_LISTEN)
>                 return -ENOTCONN;
> -       while ((skb = tcp_recv_skb(sk, seq, &offset)) != NULL) {
> +       while ((skb = tcp_recv_skb(sk, seq, &offset, false)) != NULL) {
>                 if (offset < skb->len) {
>                         int used;
>                         size_t len;
> @@ -1677,7 +1679,7 @@ int tcp_read_sock(struct sock *sk, read_descriptor_t *desc,
>                          * getting here: tcp_collapse might have deleted it
>                          * while aggregating skbs from the socket queue.
>                          */
> -                       skb = tcp_recv_skb(sk, seq - 1, &offset);
> +                       skb = tcp_recv_skb(sk, seq - 1, &offset, false);
>                         if (!skb)
>                                 break;
>                         /* TCP coalescing might have appended data to the skb.
> @@ -1702,13 +1704,58 @@ int tcp_read_sock(struct sock *sk, read_descriptor_t *desc,
>
>         /* Clean up data we have read: This will do ACK frames. */
>         if (copied > 0) {
> -               tcp_recv_skb(sk, seq, &offset);
> +               tcp_recv_skb(sk, seq, &offset, false);
>                 tcp_cleanup_rbuf(sk, copied);
>         }
>         return copied;
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(tcp_read_sock);
>
> +int tcp_read_skb(struct sock *sk, read_descriptor_t *desc,
> +                sk_read_actor_t recv_actor)
> +{
> +       struct tcp_sock *tp = tcp_sk(sk);
> +       u32 seq = tp->copied_seq;
> +       struct sk_buff *skb;
> +       int copied = 0;
> +       u32 offset;
> +
> +       if (sk->sk_state == TCP_LISTEN)
> +               return -ENOTCONN;
> +
> +       while ((skb = tcp_recv_skb(sk, seq, &offset, true)) != NULL) {

[3]
            The unlink from sk->sk_receive_queue could happen here.

> +               int used = recv_actor(desc, skb, 0, skb->len);
> +
> +               if (used <= 0) {
> +                       if (!copied)
> +                               copied = used;
> +                       break;
> +               }
> +               seq += used;
> +               copied += used;
> +
> +               if (TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->tcp_flags & TCPHDR_FIN) {
> +                       kfree_skb(skb);

[1]

The two kfree_skb() ([1] & [2]) should be a consume_skb() ?

> +                       ++seq;
> +                       break;
> +               }
> +               kfree_skb(skb);

[2]


> +               if (!desc->count)
> +                       break;
> +               WRITE_ONCE(tp->copied_seq, seq);
> +       }
> +       WRITE_ONCE(tp->copied_seq, seq);
> +
> +       tcp_rcv_space_adjust(sk);
> +
> +       /* Clean up data we have read: This will do ACK frames. */
> +       if (copied > 0)
> +               tcp_cleanup_rbuf(sk, copied);
> +
> +       return copied;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(tcp_read_skb);
> +
>  int tcp_peek_len(struct socket *sock)
>  {
>         return tcp_inq(sock->sk);
> @@ -1890,7 +1937,7 @@ static int receive_fallback_to_copy(struct sock *sk,
>                 struct sk_buff *skb;
>                 u32 offset;
>
> -               skb = tcp_recv_skb(sk, tcp_sk(sk)->copied_seq, &offset);
> +               skb = tcp_recv_skb(sk, tcp_sk(sk)->copied_seq, &offset, false);
>                 if (skb)
>                         tcp_zerocopy_set_hint_for_skb(sk, zc, skb, offset);
>         }
> @@ -1937,7 +1984,7 @@ static int tcp_zc_handle_leftover(struct tcp_zerocopy_receive *zc,
>         if (skb) {
>                 offset = *seq - TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->seq;
>         } else {
> -               skb = tcp_recv_skb(sk, *seq, &offset);
> +               skb = tcp_recv_skb(sk, *seq, &offset, false);
>                 if (TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->has_rxtstamp) {
>                         tcp_update_recv_tstamps(skb, tss);
>                         zc->msg_flags |= TCP_CMSG_TS;
> @@ -2130,7 +2177,7 @@ static int tcp_zerocopy_receive(struct sock *sk,
>                                 skb = skb->next;
>                                 offset = seq - TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->seq;
>                         } else {
> -                               skb = tcp_recv_skb(sk, seq, &offset);
> +                               skb = tcp_recv_skb(sk, seq, &offset, false);
>                         }
>
>                         if (TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->has_rxtstamp) {
> @@ -2186,7 +2233,7 @@ static int tcp_zerocopy_receive(struct sock *sk,
>                 tcp_rcv_space_adjust(sk);
>
>                 /* Clean up data we have read: This will do ACK frames. */
> -               tcp_recv_skb(sk, seq, &offset);
> +               tcp_recv_skb(sk, seq, &offset, false);
>                 tcp_cleanup_rbuf(sk, length + copylen);
>                 ret = 0;
>                 if (length == zc->length)
> --
> 2.32.0
>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ