netdev - RE: utilizing multi queues of a net device

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <DM8PR12MB540039DD483251A8D551A02AABC09@DM8PR12MB5400.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>
Date:   Tue, 3 May 2022 10:11:04 +0000
From:   Eli Cohen <elic@...dia.com>
To:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
CC:     virtualization <virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: utilizing multi queues of a net device

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
> Sent: Monday, May 2, 2022 7:22 PM
> To: Eli Cohen <elic@...dia.com>
> Cc: virtualization <virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>; netdev@...r.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: utilizing multi queues of a net device
> 
> On Mon, 2 May 2022 04:29:09 +0000 Eli Cohen wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I am experimenting with virtio net device running on a host. The net device has
> > multiple queues and I am trying to measure the throughput while utilizing all
> > the queues simultaneously. I am running iperf3 like this:
> >
> > taskset 0x1 iperf3 -c 7.7.7.24 -p 20000 & \
> > taskset 0x2 iperf3 -c 7.7.7.24 -p 20001 & \
> > ...
> > taskset 0x80 iperf3 -c 7.7.7.24 -p 20007
> >
> > Server instances with matching ports exist.
> >
> > I was expecting traffic to be distributed over the available send queues but
> > the vast majority goes to a single queue. I do see a few packets going to other
> > queues.
> >
> > Here's what tc qdisc shows:
> >
> > tc qdisc show dev eth1
> > qdisc mq 0: root
> > qdisc fq_codel 0: parent :8 limit 10240p flows 1024 quantum 1514 target 5ms interval 100ms memory_limit 32Mb ecn drop_batch 64
> > qdisc fq_codel 0: parent :7 limit 10240p flows 1024 quantum 1514 target 5ms interval 100ms memory_limit 32Mb ecn drop_batch 64
> > qdisc fq_codel 0: parent :6 limit 10240p flows 1024 quantum 1514 target 5ms interval 100ms memory_limit 32Mb ecn drop_batch 64
> > qdisc fq_codel 0: parent :5 limit 10240p flows 1024 quantum 1514 target 5ms interval 100ms memory_limit 32Mb ecn drop_batch 64
> > qdisc fq_codel 0: parent :4 limit 10240p flows 1024 quantum 1514 target 5ms interval 100ms memory_limit 32Mb ecn drop_batch 64
> > qdisc fq_codel 0: parent :3 limit 10240p flows 1024 quantum 1514 target 5ms interval 100ms memory_limit 32Mb ecn drop_batch 64
> > qdisc fq_codel 0: parent :2 limit 10240p flows 1024 quantum 1514 target 5ms interval 100ms memory_limit 32Mb ecn drop_batch 64
> > qdisc fq_codel 0: parent :1 limit 10240p flows 1024 quantum 1514 target 5ms interval 100ms memory_limit 32Mb ecn drop_batch 64
> >
> > Any idea?
> 
> Make sure XPS is configured correctly. Looks like virtio_net cooked
> a less-than-prevalent-for-networking way of distributing CPUs.

That make the trick.
Thanks!