lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 4 May 2022 18:21:02 +0300
From:   Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
To:     Frank Wunderlich <linux@...web.de>
Cc:     linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org,
        Frank Wunderlich <frank-w@...lic-files.de>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
        Sean Wang <sean.wang@...iatek.com>,
        Landen Chao <Landen.Chao@...iatek.com>,
        DENG Qingfang <dqfext@...il.com>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
        Peter Geis <pgwipeout@...il.com>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC v2 1/4] net: dsa: mt7530: rework mt7530_hw_vlan_{add,del}

On Sat, Apr 30, 2022 at 03:03:44PM +0200, Frank Wunderlich wrote:
> From: Frank Wunderlich <frank-w@...lic-files.de>
> 
> Rework vlan_add/vlan_del functions in preparation for dynamic cpu port.
> 
> Currently BIT(MT7530_CPU_PORT) is added to new_members, even though
> mt7530_port_vlan_add() will be called on the CPU port too.
> 
> Let DSA core decide when to call port_vlan_add for the CPU port, rather
> than doing it implicitly.
> 
> We can do autonomous forwarding in a certain VLAN, but not add br0 to that
> VLAN and avoid flooding the CPU with those packets, if software knows it
> doesn't need to process them.
> 
> Suggested-by: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
> Signed-off-by: Frank Wunderlich <frank-w@...lic-files.de>
> ---

Reviewed-by: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ