[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YnH39sfvRu/GUJIB@640551eb7a4c>
Date: Wed, 4 May 2022 11:50:14 +0800
From: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
To: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@...nel.org>, bpf@...r.kernel.org
Cc: kbuild-all@...ts.01.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, ast@...nel.org,
daniel@...earbox.net, andrii@...nel.org, davem@...emloft.net,
kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, pablo@...filter.org,
fw@...len.de, netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org,
lorenzo.bianconi@...hat.com, brouer@...hat.com, toke@...hat.com,
memxor@...il.com
Subject: [RFC PATCH] net: netfilter: bpf_ct_refresh_timeout() can be static
net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_bpf.c:230:6: warning: symbol 'bpf_ct_refresh_timeout' was not declared. Should it be static?
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
---
net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_bpf.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_bpf.c b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_bpf.c
index d6dcadf0e0166..02d2578d4bb89 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_bpf.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_bpf.c
@@ -227,7 +227,7 @@ void bpf_ct_release(struct nf_conn *nfct)
* bpf_xdp_ct_lookup or bpf_skb_ct_lookup.
* @timeout - delta time in msecs used to increase the ct entry lifetime.
*/
-void bpf_ct_refresh_timeout(struct nf_conn *nfct, u32 timeout)
+static void bpf_ct_refresh_timeout(struct nf_conn *nfct, u32 timeout)
{
if (!nfct)
return;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists